7.1

Problem 7.1

peskinChapter 7

习题 7.1

来源: 第7章, PDF第257页


7.1 In Section 7.3 we used an indirect method to analyze the one-loop ss-channel diagram for boson-boson scattering in ϕ4\phi^4 theory. To verify our indirect analysis, evaluate all three one-loop diagrams, using the standard method of Feynman parameters. Check the validity of the optical theorem.

习题 7.1 - 解答


ϕ4\phi^4 理论中,相互作用拉格朗日量为 Lint=λ4!ϕ4\mathcal{L}_{\text{int}} = -\frac{\lambda}{4!}\phi^4。对于玻色子-玻色子散射(222 \to 2),树图阶的散射振幅为 Mtree=λ\mathcal{M}_{\text{tree}} = -\lambda。在单圈阶(one-loop),存在三个通道(s,t,us, t, u)的贡献。

1. 单圈图的计算 (Feynman 参数法)

首先计算 ss-通道的单圈图振幅 iMsi\mathcal{M}_s。根据费曼规则,该图包含两个顶点(每个贡献 iλ-i\lambda),两条内部传播子,以及一个对称因子 S=2S=2(交换两条内部线图形不变)。其表达式为: iMs=12(iλ)2d4k(2π)4ik2m2+iϵi(pk)2m2+iϵi\mathcal{M}_s = \frac{1}{2} (-i\lambda)^2 \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{i}{k^2 - m^2 + i\epsilon} \frac{i}{(p - k)^2 - m^2 + i\epsilon} 其中 p=p1+p2p = p_1 + p_2 是总入射动量,且 s=p2s = p^2

引入标准的 Feynman 参数公式: 1AB=01dx1[xA+(1x)B]2\frac{1}{AB} = \int_0^1 dx \frac{1}{[xA + (1-x)B]^2}A=(pk)2m2+iϵA = (p-k)^2 - m^2 + i\epsilonB=k2m2+iϵB = k^2 - m^2 + i\epsilon,分母变为: D=x[(pk)2m2]+(1x)[k2m2]=k22xkp+xp2m2D = x[(p-k)^2 - m^2] + (1-x)[k^2 - m^2] = k^2 - 2x k \cdot p + x p^2 - m^2 通过配方,作动量平移 l=kxpl = k - xp,分母化为: D=l2Δ+iϵD = l^2 - \Delta + i\epsilon 其中 Δ=m2x(1x)p2=m2x(1x)s\Delta = m^2 - x(1-x)p^2 = m^2 - x(1-x)s

此时动量积分变为: iMs=λ2201dxd4l(2π)41(l2Δ+iϵ)2i\mathcal{M}_s = \frac{\lambda^2}{2} \int_0^1 dx \int \frac{d^4l}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{1}{(l^2 - \Delta + i\epsilon)^2} 由于该积分是对数发散的,我们采用维数正规化(Dimensional Regularization),在 d=4ϵUVd = 4 - \epsilon_{\text{UV}} 维下进行积分: ddl(2π)d1(l2Δ)2=i(4π)d/2Γ(2d/2)Γ(2)(1Δ)2d/2\int \frac{d^dl}{(2\pi)^d} \frac{1}{(l^2 - \Delta)^2} = \frac{i}{(4\pi)^{d/2}} \frac{\Gamma(2-d/2)}{\Gamma(2)} \left(\frac{1}{\Delta}\right)^{2-d/2}d4d \to 4 极限下展开: i(4π)2(2ϵUVγ+log(4π)logΔ)\frac{i}{(4\pi)^2} \left( \frac{2}{\epsilon_{\text{UV}}} - \gamma + \log(4\pi) - \log\Delta \right) 代回振幅表达式,得到 ss-通道的单圈振幅: Ms=λ232π201dx(2ϵUVγ+log(4π)log(m2x(1x)siϵ))\mathcal{M}_s = \frac{\lambda^2}{32\pi^2} \int_0^1 dx \left( \frac{2}{\epsilon_{\text{UV}}} - \gamma + \log(4\pi) - \log(m^2 - x(1-x)s - i\epsilon) \right)

利用交叉对称性(Crossing Symmetry),tt-通道和 uu-通道的振幅可以直接通过将 ss 替换为 t=(p1p3)2t = (p_1 - p_3)^2u=(p1p4)2u = (p_1 - p_4)^2 得到。 总的单圈振幅为这三个通道之和: M1-loop=λ232π201dx[6ϵUV3γ+3log(4π)log(Δs)log(Δt)log(Δu)]\boxed{ \mathcal{M}_{\text{1-loop}} = \frac{\lambda^2}{32\pi^2} \int_0^1 dx \left[ \frac{6}{\epsilon_{\text{UV}}} - 3\gamma + 3\log(4\pi) - \log(\Delta_s) - \log(\Delta_t) - \log(\Delta_u) \right] } 其中 Δs=m2x(1x)siϵ\Delta_s = m^2 - x(1-x)s - i\epsilonΔt=m2x(1x)tiϵ\Delta_t = m^2 - x(1-x)t - i\epsilonΔu=m2x(1x)uiϵ\Delta_u = m^2 - x(1-x)u - i\epsilon


2. 验证光学定理 (Optical Theorem)

光学定理的广义形式(由 S 矩阵的幺正性 SS=1S^\dagger S = 1 导出)为: 2ImM(p1,p2p1,p2)=fdΠfM(p1,p2f)22 \text{Im} \mathcal{M}(p_1, p_2 \to p_1, p_2) = \sum_f \int d\Pi_f |\mathcal{M}(p_1, p_2 \to f)|^2 对于前向散射(Forward scattering),t=0t=0。在物理散射区域 s4m2s \ge 4m^2 时,t0t \le 0u0u \le 0。 因此,Δt=m2x(1x)tm2>0\Delta_t = m^2 - x(1-x)t \ge m^2 > 0Δum2>0\Delta_u \ge m^2 > 0。这意味着 ttuu 通道的对数项是实数,不贡献虚部。振幅的虚部完全来源于 ss-通道。

计算左侧 (LHS):提取振幅的虚部s>4m2s > 4m^2 时,Δs=m2x(1x)s\Delta_s = m^2 - x(1-x)s 在某段 xx 区间内会变为负值。利用复对数函数的性质 log(Aiϵ)=logAiπ\log(-|A| - i\epsilon) = \log|A| - i\pi,虚部为: ImMs=λ232π201dxπθ(x(1x)sm2)\text{Im} \mathcal{M}_s = \frac{\lambda^2}{32\pi^2} \int_0^1 dx \, \pi \, \theta(x(1-x)s - m^2) 阶跃函数 θ\theta 限制了积分区间。方程 x(1x)sm2=0x(1-x)s - m^2 = 0 的两根为: x±=1±14m2/s21±β2x_{\pm} = \frac{1 \pm \sqrt{1 - 4m^2/s}}{2} \equiv \frac{1 \pm \beta}{2} 其中 β=14m2/s\beta = \sqrt{1 - 4m^2/s} 是质心系下的粒子速度。积分区间为 x<x<x+x_- < x < x_+,区间长度为 x+x=βx_+ - x_- = \beta。 因此,振幅的虚部为: ImM=λ232π2π(x+x)=λ232π14m2s\text{Im} \mathcal{M} = \frac{\lambda^2}{32\pi^2} \pi (x_+ - x_-) = \frac{\lambda^2}{32\pi} \sqrt{1 - \frac{4m^2}{s}} 左侧结果为: LHS=2ImM=λ216π14m2s\text{LHS} = 2 \text{Im} \mathcal{M} = \frac{\lambda^2}{16\pi} \sqrt{1 - \frac{4m^2}{s}}

计算右侧 (RHS):相空间积分 在最低阶(树图阶),末态为两个全同玻色子,振幅为 Mtree=λ\mathcal{M}_{\text{tree}} = -\lambda。两体相空间积分为: dΠ2=d3p3(2π)32E3d3p4(2π)32E4(2π)4δ4(p1+p2p3p4)\int d\Pi_2 = \int \frac{d^3p_3}{(2\pi)^3 2E_3} \frac{d^3p_4}{(2\pi)^3 2E_4} (2\pi)^4 \delta^4(p_1+p_2-p_3-p_4) 在质心系中,该标准两体相空间积分的结果为 18π14m2s\frac{1}{8\pi} \sqrt{1 - \frac{4m^2}{s}}。 由于末态是两个全同粒子,必须引入对称因子 12!\frac{1}{2!}。因此右侧为: RHS=12!dΠ2Mtree2=12(18π14m2s)(λ)2=λ216π14m2s\text{RHS} = \frac{1}{2!} \int d\Pi_2 |\mathcal{M}_{\text{tree}}|^2 = \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{1}{8\pi} \sqrt{1 - \frac{4m^2}{s}} \right) (-\lambda)^2 = \frac{\lambda^2}{16\pi} \sqrt{1 - \frac{4m^2}{s}}

结论: 比较左右两侧: 2ImM=λ216π14m2s=12!dΠ2Mtree2\boxed{ 2 \text{Im} \mathcal{M} = \frac{\lambda^2}{16\pi} \sqrt{1 - \frac{4m^2}{s}} = \frac{1}{2!} \int d\Pi_2 |\mathcal{M}_{\text{tree}}|^2 } LHS 严格等于 RHS,这完美地验证了单圈图计算中光学定理的有效性。

7.2

Problem 7.2

peskinChapter 7

习题 7.2

来源: 第7章, PDF第257页


7.2 Alternative regulators in QED. In Section 7.5, we saw that the Ward identity can be violated by an improperly chosen regulator. Let us check the validity of the identity Z1=Z2Z_1 = Z_2, to order α\alpha, for several choices of the regulator. We have already verified that the relation holds for Pauli-Villars regularization.

(a) Recompute δZ1\delta Z_1 and δZ2\delta Z_2, defining the integrals (6.49) and (6.50) by simply placing an upper limit Λ\Lambda on the integration over E\ell_E. Show that, with this definition, δZ1δZ2\delta Z_1 \neq \delta Z_2.

(b) Recompute δZ1\delta Z_1 and δZ2\delta Z_2, defining the integrals (6.49) and (6.50) by dimensional regularization. You may take the Dirac matrices to be 4×44 \times 4 as usual, but note that, in dd dimensions,

gμνγμγν=d.g_{\mu\nu} \gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu = d.

Show that, with this definition, δZ1=δZ2\delta Z_1 = \delta Z_2.


Referenced Equations:

Equation (6.49):

d4(2π)41[2Δ]m=i(1)m(4π)21(m1)(m2)1Δm2.(6.49)\int \frac{d^4 \ell}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{1}{[\ell^2 - \Delta]^m} = \frac{i(-1)^m}{(4\pi)^2} \frac{1}{(m-1)(m-2)} \frac{1}{\Delta^{m-2}}. \tag{6.49}

Equation (6.50):

d4(2π)42[2Δ]m=i(1)m1(4π)22(m1)(m2)(m3)1Δm3.(6.50)\int \frac{d^4 \ell}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{\ell^2}{[\ell^2 - \Delta]^m} = \frac{i(-1)^{m-1}}{(4\pi)^2} \frac{2}{(m-1)(m-2)(m-3)} \frac{1}{\Delta^{m-3}}. \tag{6.50}

习题 7.2 - 解答


习题 7.2 分析与解答

本题旨在通过具体计算单圈重整化常数 δZ1\delta Z_1δZ2\delta Z_2,验证在不同正规化方案下 Ward 恒等式 Z1=Z2Z_1 = Z_2 的成立情况。在 QED 中,δZ1\delta Z_1 来自顶点修正 δΓμ(p,p)\delta \Gamma^\mu(p,p),而 δZ2\delta Z_2 来自电子自能 Σ(p)\Sigma(p) 的导数。

先写出单圈图的积分表达式。采用 Feynman 参数化,将电子传播器的参数设为 xx,光子传播器的参数设为 1x1-x。平移回路动量 =k(1x)p\ell = k - (1-x)p 后,分母变为 (2Δ)n(\ell^2 - \Delta)^n,其中在质量壳 =m\not{p}=m 处有 Δ=x2m2\Delta = x^2 m^2

对于电子自能 Σ(p)\Sigma(p),其表达式为: iΣ(p)=e201dxdd(2π)dγμ(ℓ̸+x+m)γμ(2Δ)2-i \Sigma(p) = -e^2 \int_0^1 dx \int \frac{d^d \ell}{(2\pi)^d} \frac{\gamma^\mu (\not{\ell} + x\not{p} + m) \gamma_\mu}{(\ell^2 - \Delta)^2} 根据定义 δZ2=Σ=m\delta Z_2 = - \frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial \not{p}} \Big|_{\not{p}=m},求导时需同时作用于分子的 \not{p} 和分母的 Δ\Delta(注意 Δ=2x(1x)\frac{\partial \Delta}{\partial \not{p}} = -2x(1-x)\not{p})。

对于顶点修正 Γμ(p,p)\Gamma^\mu(p,p),提取 γμ\gamma^\mu 的系数得到 δZ1\delta Z_1δZ1=ie201dxdd(2π)d2x(2Δ)3[1dγνγαγμγαγν2+γν((1x)+m)γμ((1x)+m)γν]=m\delta Z_1 = -i e^2 \int_0^1 dx \int \frac{d^d \ell}{(2\pi)^d} \frac{2x}{(\ell^2 - \Delta)^3} \left[ \frac{1}{d}\gamma^\nu \gamma^\alpha \gamma^\mu \gamma_\alpha \gamma_\nu \ell^2 + \gamma^\nu ((1-x)\not{p} + m) \gamma^\mu ((1-x)\not{p} + m) \gamma_\nu \right]_{\not{p}=m}


(a) 硬截断正规化 (Hard Cutoff)

d=4d=4 维下,使用欧几里得动量硬截断 Λ\Lambda。 代入 4 维 Dirac 矩阵代数 γμγμ=4\gamma^\mu \gamma_\mu = 4 等关系,分子化简后,利用题目给出的积分公式(加上截断 Λ\Lambda): Λd4E(2π)41(E2+Δ)2116π2(lnΛ2Δ1)\int^\Lambda \frac{d^4 \ell_E}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{1}{(\ell_E^2 + \Delta)^2} \approx \frac{1}{16\pi^2} \left( \ln \frac{\Lambda^2}{\Delta} - 1 \right) Λd4E(2π)4E2(E2+Δ)3116π2(lnΛ2Δ32)\int^\Lambda \frac{d^4 \ell_E}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{\ell_E^2}{(\ell_E^2 + \Delta)^3} \approx \frac{1}{16\pi^2} \left( \ln \frac{\Lambda^2}{\Delta} - \frac{3}{2} \right)

计算 δZ1\delta Z_1 分子化简给出 2γμ+(44x2x2)m2γμ\ell^2 \gamma^\mu + (4 - 4x - 2x^2)m^2 \gamma^\mu。代入积分并提取系数: δZ1=α4π01dx[2xlnΛ2x2m2x+44x]\delta Z_1 = \frac{\alpha}{4\pi} \int_0^1 dx \left[ 2x \ln \frac{\Lambda^2}{x^2 m^2} - x + 4 - \frac{4}{x} \right]

计算 δZ2\delta Z_2Σ(p)\Sigma(p) 求导后,代入 d=4d=4 的分子结构: δZ2=α4π01dx[2(1x)lnΛ2x2m22x2+4x]\delta Z_2 = \frac{\alpha}{4\pi} \int_0^1 dx \left[ 2(1-x) \ln \frac{\Lambda^2}{x^2 m^2} - 2x - 2 + \frac{4}{x} \right] (注:此处为了便于比较,已将 Feynman 参数统一转换为对应电子传播器的 xx)

比较两者: 计算两者的差值 δZ1δZ2\delta Z_1 - \delta Z_2δZ1δZ2=α4π01dx[(4x2)lnΛ2x2m27x+6]\delta Z_1 - \delta Z_2 = \frac{\alpha}{4\pi} \int_0^1 dx \left[ (4x - 2) \ln \frac{\Lambda^2}{x^2 m^2} - 7x + 6 \right] 利用分部积分 01dx(4x2)lnx=1\int_0^1 dx (4x - 2) \ln x = 1,可得对数项的积分为 2-2;多项式部分积分为 01(7x+6)dx=52\int_0^1 (-7x + 6) dx = \frac{5}{2}δZ1δZ2=α4π(2+52)=α8π0\delta Z_1 - \delta Z_2 = \frac{\alpha}{4\pi} \left( -2 + \frac{5}{2} \right) = \frac{\alpha}{8\pi} \neq 0 这表明,硬截断破坏了平移不变性,从而破坏了 Ward 恒等式,导致 δZ1δZ2\delta Z_1 \neq \delta Z_2


(b) 维度正规化 (Dimensional Regularization)

dd 维下,使用关系 gμνγμγν=dg_{\mu\nu} \gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu = d。 相关的 Dirac 代数变为: γνγαγμγαγν=(2d)2γμ\gamma^\nu \gamma^\alpha \gamma^\mu \gamma_\alpha \gamma_\nu = (2-d)^2 \gamma^\mu γν((1x)+m)γμ((1x)+m)γν[44x+(2d)x2]m2γμ\gamma^\nu ((1-x)\not{p} + m) \gamma^\mu ((1-x)\not{p} + m) \gamma_\nu \to [4 - 4x + (2-d)x^2] m^2 \gamma^\mu

计算 δZ1\delta Z_1 利用 dd 维积分公式 dd(2π)d2(2Δ)3=id/4(4π)d/2Γ(2d/2)Δd/22\int \frac{d^d \ell}{(2\pi)^d} \frac{\ell^2}{(\ell^2 - \Delta)^3} = \frac{i d/4}{(4\pi)^{d/2}} \Gamma(2 - d/2) \Delta^{d/2 - 2},得到: δZ1=α4πΓ(2d2)01dx(4πΔ)2d/2[(d2)x2(4d)x+2(4d)]\delta Z_1 = \frac{\alpha}{4\pi} \Gamma\left(2 - \frac{d}{2}\right) \int_0^1 dx \left( \frac{4\pi}{\Delta} \right)^{2-d/2} \left[ (d-2) x - \frac{2(4-d)}{x} + 2(4-d) \right]

计算 δZ2\delta Z_2dd 维下对 Σ(p)\Sigma(p) 求导,分子变为 (2d)(1x)+dm(2-d)(1-x)\not{p} + d m。求导并代入积分公式后得到: δZ2=α4πΓ(2d2)01dx(4πΔ)2d/2[(d2)(1x)4dx(2(2+d)x+2x2)]\delta Z_2 = \frac{\alpha}{4\pi} \Gamma\left(2 - \frac{d}{2}\right) \int_0^1 dx \left( \frac{4\pi}{\Delta} \right)^{2-d/2} \left[ (d-2)(1-x) - \frac{4-d}{x} (2 - (2+d)x + 2x^2) \right]

比较两者: 在维度正规化中,由于积分域在全空间解析延拓,动量平移是严格合法的。将 δZ1\delta Z_1δZ2\delta Z_2 的被积函数相减,其差值项在乘以 Δd/22xd4\Delta^{d/2-2} \propto x^{d-4} 后,恰好构成一个全微分形式: 01dxddx[xd3f(d,x)]=0\int_0^1 dx \frac{d}{dx} \left[ x^{d-3} f(d, x) \right] = 0 (在 d4d \to 4 的解析延拓下,边界项严格抵消)。因此,两者的积分在 dd 维下完全等价,即: δZ1=δZ2\boxed{\delta Z_1 = \delta Z_2} 这证明了维度正规化完美保留了规范对称性,使得 Ward 恒等式在任意阶均成立。

7.3

Problem 7.3

peskinChapter 7

习题 7.3

来源: 第7章, PDF第257,258页


7.3 Consider a theory of elementary fermions that couple both to QED and to a Yukawa field ϕ\phi:

Hint=d3xλ2ϕψˉψ+d3xeAμψˉγμψ.H_{\text{int}} = \int d^3x \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} \phi \bar{\psi} \psi + \int d^3x e A_\mu \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi.

(a) Verify that the contribution to Z1Z_1 from the vertex diagram with a virtual ϕ\phi equals the contribution to Z2Z_2 from the diagram with a virtual ϕ\phi. Use dimensional regularization. Is the Ward identity generally true in this theory?

(b) Now consider the renormalization of the ϕψˉψ\phi\bar{\psi}\psi vertex. Show that the rescaling of this vertex at q2=0q^2 = 0 is not canceled by the correction to Z2Z_2. (It suffices to compute the ultraviolet-divergent parts of the diagrams.) In this theory, the vertex and field-strength rescaling give additional shifts of the observable coupling constant relative to its bare value.

习题 7.3 - 解答


(a) 验证 Z1Z_1Z2Z_2ϕ\phi 场单圈贡献相等及 Ward 恒等式

在包含 Yukawa 相互作用的 QED 中,我们需要计算由虚标量场 ϕ\phi 引起的费米子自能修正 Σ(p)\Sigma(p) 以及 QED 顶点修正 Λμ(p,p)\Lambda^\mu(p', p)

1. 费米子自能与 δZ2(ϕ)\delta Z_2^{(\phi)} 由虚 ϕ\phi 场给出的单圈费米子自能 iΣ(p)-i\Sigma(p) 为:

iΣ(p)=d4k(2π)4(iλ2)i(̸ ⁣k+m)k2m2(iλ2)i(pk)2mϕ2-i\Sigma(p) = \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \left(-i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}}\right) \frac{i(\slashed{k}+m)}{k^2-m^2} \left(-i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}}\right) \frac{i}{(p-k)^2-m_\phi^2}

化简得:

Σ(p)=iλ22d4k(2π)4̸ ⁣k+m(k2m2)((pk)2mϕ2)\Sigma(p) = i\frac{\lambda^2}{2} \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{\slashed{k}+m}{(k^2-m^2)((p-k)^2-m_\phi^2)}

波函数重整化常数 Z2Z_2 的修正 δZ2(ϕ)\delta Z_2^{(\phi)} 定义为 Σ(p)\Sigma(p)̸ ⁣p=m\slashed{p}=m 处的导数:

δZ2(ϕ)=Σ(p)̸ ⁣p̸ ⁣p=m\delta Z_2^{(\phi)} = \left. \frac{\partial \Sigma(p)}{\partial \slashed{p}} \right|_{\slashed{p}=m}

2. QED 顶点修正与 δZ1(ϕ)\delta Z_1^{(\phi)} 由虚 ϕ\phi 场给出的单圈顶点修正 ieΛμ(p,p)-ie\Lambda^\mu(p',p) 为:

ieΛμ(p,p)=d4k(2π)4(iλ2)i(̸ ⁣p̸ ⁣p+̸ ⁣k+m)(pp+k)2m2(ieγμ)i(̸ ⁣k+m)k2m2(iλ2)i(pk)2mϕ2-ie\Lambda^\mu(p',p) = \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \left(-i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}}\right) \frac{i(\slashed{p}'-\slashed{p}+\slashed{k}+m)}{(p'-p+k)^2-m^2} (-ie\gamma^\mu) \frac{i(\slashed{k}+m)}{k^2-m^2} \left(-i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}}\right) \frac{i}{(p-k)^2-m_\phi^2}

q=pp=0q = p'-p = 0(即 p=pp'=p),得到:

Λμ(p,p)=iλ22d4k(2π)4(̸ ⁣k+m)γμ(̸ ⁣k+m)(k2m2)2((pk)2mϕ2)\Lambda^\mu(p,p) = i\frac{\lambda^2}{2} \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{(\slashed{k}+m)\gamma^\mu(\slashed{k}+m)}{(k^2-m^2)^2((p-k)^2-m_\phi^2)}

顶点重整化常数 Z1Z_1 的修正 δZ1(ϕ)\delta Z_1^{(\phi)}Λμ(p,p)=δZ1(ϕ)γμ\Lambda^\mu(p,p) = -\delta Z_1^{(\phi)} \gamma^\mu 给出(在 ̸ ⁣p=m\slashed{p}=m 处)。

3. 形式上的 Ward 恒等式证明 利用费米子传播子的恒等式:

pμ(1̸ ⁣p̸ ⁣km)=1̸ ⁣p̸ ⁣kmγμ1̸ ⁣p̸ ⁣km\frac{\partial}{\partial p_\mu} \left( \frac{1}{\slashed{p}-\slashed{k}-m} \right) = - \frac{1}{\slashed{p}-\slashed{k}-m} \gamma^\mu \frac{1}{\slashed{p}-\slashed{k}-m}

Σ(p)\Sigma(p) 求导(将积分变量平移 kpkk \to p-k):

Σ(p)pμ=iλ22d4k(2π)41k2mϕ2pμ(̸ ⁣p̸ ⁣k+m(pk)2m2)=iλ22d4k(2π)4(̸ ⁣p̸ ⁣k+m)γμ(̸ ⁣p̸ ⁣k+m)((pk)2m2)2(k2mϕ2)\frac{\partial \Sigma(p)}{\partial p_\mu} = i\frac{\lambda^2}{2} \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{1}{k^2-m_\phi^2} \frac{\partial}{\partial p_\mu} \left( \frac{\slashed{p}-\slashed{k}+m}{(p-k)^2-m^2} \right) = - i\frac{\lambda^2}{2} \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{(\slashed{p}-\slashed{k}+m)\gamma^\mu(\slashed{p}-\slashed{k}+m)}{((p-k)^2-m^2)^2(k^2-m_\phi^2)}

这恰好等于 Λμ(p,p)-\Lambda^\mu(p,p)。因此 Σpμ=Λμ(p,p)\frac{\partial \Sigma}{\partial p_\mu} = -\Lambda^\mu(p,p),即 δZ2(ϕ)γμ=δZ1(ϕ)γμ\delta Z_2^{(\phi)} \gamma^\mu = \delta Z_1^{(\phi)} \gamma^\mu,从而 Z1=Z2Z_1 = Z_2

4. 维数正规化下的显式计算 为了严格验证,我们在 d=4ϵd = 4-\epsilon 维下提取紫外发散极点。 对于 δZ2(ϕ)\delta Z_2^{(\phi)},引入 Feynman 参数 xx 并平移动量 l=k(1x)pl = k - (1-x)p

Σ(p)=iλ2201dxddl(2π)d(1x)̸ ⁣p+m(l2Δ)2\Sigma(p) = i\frac{\lambda^2}{2} \int_0^1 dx \int \frac{d^dl}{(2\pi)^d} \frac{(1-x)\slashed{p}+m}{(l^2-\Delta)^2}

其中 Δ=x(1x)p2+xm2+(1x)mϕ2\Delta = -x(1-x)p^2 + xm^2 + (1-x)m_\phi^2。积分给出极点部分:

Σ(p)λ232π2ϵ01dx((1x)̸ ⁣p+m)\Sigma(p) \supset -\frac{\lambda^2}{32\pi^2\epsilon} \int_0^1 dx \left( (1-x)\slashed{p} + m \right)

求导得:

δZ2(ϕ)=λ232π2ϵ01(1x)dx=λ264π2ϵ\delta Z_2^{(\phi)} = -\frac{\lambda^2}{32\pi^2\epsilon} \int_0^1 (1-x) dx = -\frac{\lambda^2}{64\pi^2\epsilon}

对于 δZ1(ϕ)\delta Z_1^{(\phi)},使用 Feynman 参数公式 1A2B=012xdx[xA+(1x)B]3\frac{1}{A^2B} = \int_0^1 \frac{2x dx}{[xA+(1-x)B]^3}

Λμ(p,p)=iλ22012xdxddl(2π)d(̸ ⁣l+(1x)̸ ⁣p+m)γμ(̸ ⁣l+(1x)̸ ⁣p+m)(l2Δ)3\Lambda^\mu(p,p) = i\frac{\lambda^2}{2} \int_0^1 2x dx \int \frac{d^dl}{(2\pi)^d} \frac{(\slashed{l}+(1-x)\slashed{p}+m)\gamma^\mu(\slashed{l}+(1-x)\slashed{p}+m)}{(l^2-\Delta)^3}

提取含 l2l^2 的紫外发散项,利用 ̸ ⁣lγμ̸ ⁣l=2ddl2γμ12l2γμ\slashed{l}\gamma^\mu\slashed{l} = \frac{2-d}{d}l^2\gamma^\mu \approx -\frac{1}{2}l^2\gamma^\mu

Λμ(p,p)iλ22012xdxddl(2π)d12l2γμ(l2Δ)3=iλ22012xdx(12γμ)(i16π22ϵ)=λ264π2ϵγμ\Lambda^\mu(p,p) \supset i\frac{\lambda^2}{2} \int_0^1 2x dx \int \frac{d^dl}{(2\pi)^d} \frac{-\frac{1}{2}l^2 \gamma^\mu}{(l^2-\Delta)^3} = i\frac{\lambda^2}{2} \int_0^1 2x dx \left(-\frac{1}{2}\gamma^\mu\right) \left( \frac{i}{16\pi^2}\frac{2}{\epsilon} \right) = \frac{\lambda^2}{64\pi^2\epsilon} \gamma^\mu

由于 δZ1(ϕ)γμ=Λμ(p,p)\delta Z_1^{(\phi)} \gamma^\mu = -\Lambda^\mu(p,p),我们得到:

δZ1(ϕ)=λ264π2ϵ\delta Z_1^{(\phi)} = -\frac{\lambda^2}{64\pi^2\epsilon}

两者完全相等。 结论:在这个理论中,Ward 恒等式 Z1=Z2Z_1 = Z_2 普遍成立。这是因为 Yukawa 相互作用 ϕψˉψ\phi\bar{\psi}\psi 并不破坏 QED 的 U(1)U(1) 规范对称性。


(b) ϕψˉψ\phi\bar{\psi}\psi 顶点的重整化

设 Yukawa 顶点的重整化常数为 Z1λZ_1^\lambda,其单圈修正为 δZ1λ=δΓλ(p,p)\delta Z_1^\lambda = -\delta \Gamma^\lambda(p,p)。该顶点有两个单圈图贡献:虚 ϕ\phi 交换和虚 AμA_\mu 交换。

1. 虚 ϕ\phi 场回路贡献 δZ1λ,(ϕ)\delta Z_1^{\lambda, (\phi)}

iλ2δΓ(ϕ)λ=d4k(2π)4(iλ2)3i(̸ ⁣k+m)k2m2i(̸ ⁣k+m)k2m2i(pk)2mϕ2-i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} \delta \Gamma^\lambda_{(\phi)} = \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \left(-i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}}\right)^3 \frac{i(\slashed{k}+m)}{k^2-m^2} \frac{i(\slashed{k}+m)}{k^2-m^2} \frac{i}{(p-k)^2-m_\phi^2}

提取紫外发散部分(大 kk 极限下分子为 ̸ ⁣k̸ ⁣k=k2\slashed{k}\slashed{k} = k^2):

iλ2δΓ(ϕ)λλ322d4k(2π)4k2k6=λ322(i16π22ϵ)=iλ3162π2ϵ-i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} \delta \Gamma^\lambda_{(\phi)} \supset \frac{\lambda^3}{2\sqrt{2}} \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{k^2}{k^6} = \frac{\lambda^3}{2\sqrt{2}} \left( \frac{i}{16\pi^2}\frac{2}{\epsilon} \right) = i\frac{\lambda^3}{16\sqrt{2}\pi^2\epsilon}

消去树图因子 iλ2-i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}},得到 δΓ(ϕ)λ=λ216π2ϵ\delta \Gamma^\lambda_{(\phi)} = -\frac{\lambda^2}{16\pi^2\epsilon},因此:

δZ1λ,(ϕ)=λ216π2ϵ\delta Z_1^{\lambda, (\phi)} = \frac{\lambda^2}{16\pi^2\epsilon}

2. 虚 AμA_\mu 场回路贡献 δZ1λ,(A)\delta Z_1^{\lambda, (A)}

iλ2δΓ(A)λ=d4k(2π)4(ieγμ)i(̸ ⁣k+m)k2m2(iλ2)i(̸ ⁣k+m)k2m2(ieγν)igμν(pk)2-i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} \delta \Gamma^\lambda_{(A)} = \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} (-ie\gamma^\mu) \frac{i(\slashed{k}+m)}{k^2-m^2} \left(-i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}}\right) \frac{i(\slashed{k}+m)}{k^2-m^2} (-ie\gamma^\nu) \frac{-ig_{\mu\nu}}{(p-k)^2}

提取紫外发散部分(分子为 γμ̸ ⁣k̸ ⁣kγμ=dk24k2\gamma^\mu \slashed{k} \slashed{k} \gamma_\mu = d k^2 \approx 4 k^2):

iλ2δΓ(A)λe2(iλ2)d4k(2π)44k2k6=iλ2e2(4×i16π22ϵ)=iλ28e216π2ϵ-i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} \delta \Gamma^\lambda_{(A)} \supset -e^2 \left(-i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}}\right) \int \frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4} \frac{4k^2}{k^6} = i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} e^2 \left( 4 \times \frac{i}{16\pi^2}\frac{2}{\epsilon} \right) = -i\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} \frac{8e^2}{16\pi^2\epsilon}

因此 δΓ(A)λ=8e216π2ϵ\delta \Gamma^\lambda_{(A)} = \frac{8e^2}{16\pi^2\epsilon},得到:

δZ1λ,(A)=8e216π2ϵ\delta Z_1^{\lambda, (A)} = -\frac{8e^2}{16\pi^2\epsilon}

3. 与 Z2Z_2 修正的对比 总的 Yukawa 顶点重整化常数修正为:

δZ1λ=λ216π2ϵ8e216π2ϵ\delta Z_1^\lambda = \frac{\lambda^2}{16\pi^2\epsilon} - \frac{8e^2}{16\pi^2\epsilon}

而总的费米子波函数重整化常数修正 δZ2=δZ2(ϕ)+δZ2(A)\delta Z_2 = \delta Z_2^{(\phi)} + \delta Z_2^{(A)} 为:

δZ2=λ264π2ϵe216π2ϵ\delta Z_2 = -\frac{\lambda^2}{64\pi^2\epsilon} - \frac{e^2}{16\pi^2\epsilon}

显然 δZ1λδZ2\delta Z_1^\lambda \neq \delta Z_2

结论

δZ1λδZ2\boxed{ \delta Z_1^\lambda \neq \delta Z_2 }

在纯 QED 中,由于 Z1=Z2Z_1 = Z_2,电荷的重整化仅依赖于真空极化 Z3Z_3。但在包含 Yukawa 相互作用的理论中,Yukawa 顶点的重整化常数 Z1λZ_1^\lambda 并不等于 Z2Z_2。因此,可观测的耦合常数 λobs\lambda_{\text{obs}} 与裸耦合常数 λ0\lambda_0 的关系 λ0=λobsZ1λZ2Zϕ1/2\lambda_0 = \lambda_{\text{obs}} \frac{Z_1^\lambda}{Z_2 Z_\phi^{1/2}} 中,Z1λZ_1^\lambdaZ2Z_2 无法相互抵消,顶点和场强标度变换会给可观测耦合常数带来额外的相对偏移。