3.1

Problem 3.1

schwarzChapter 3

习题 3.1

来源: 第3章, PDF第42页


3.1 Find the generalization of the Euler–Lagrange equations for general Lagrangians, of the form L[ϕ,μϕ,νμϕ,]\mathcal{L} [\phi, \partial_\mu \phi, \partial_\nu \partial_\mu \phi, \dots].

习题 3.1 - 解答


根据最小作用量原理(哈密顿原理),系统的经典场方程(运动方程)由作用量 SS 的变分为零给出,即 δS=0\delta S = 0

考虑一个依赖于标量场 ϕ\phi 及其直到 nn 阶时空导数的广义拉格朗日密度: L=L(ϕ,μ1ϕ,μ1μ2ϕ,,μ1μ2μnϕ)\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}(\phi, \partial_{\mu_1}\phi, \partial_{\mu_1}\partial_{\mu_2}\phi, \dots, \partial_{\mu_1}\partial_{\mu_2}\dots\partial_{\mu_n}\phi)

系统的作用量定义为拉格朗日密度在全时空的积分: S=ddxLS = \int d^d x \, \mathcal{L}

对场 ϕ(x)\phi(x) 进行微小变分 ϕ(x)ϕ(x)+δϕ(x)\phi(x) \to \phi(x) + \delta\phi(x)。由于变分算符 δ\delta 与时空偏导数 μ\partial_\mu 是相互独立的线性算符,它们满足对易关系: δ(μ1μkϕ)=μ1μk(δϕ)\delta(\partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_k}\phi) = \partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_k}(\delta\phi)

利用多元复合函数的链式法则,作用量的变分可以展开为对各阶导数项变分的求和: δS=ddx[Lϕδϕ+L(μ1ϕ)δ(μ1ϕ)+L(μ1μ2ϕ)δ(μ1μ2ϕ)++L(μ1μnϕ)δ(μ1μnϕ)]\delta S = \int d^d x \left[ \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi}\delta\phi + \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu_1}\phi)}\delta(\partial_{\mu_1}\phi) + \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu_1}\partial_{\mu_2}\phi)}\delta(\partial_{\mu_1}\partial_{\mu_2}\phi) + \dots + \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_n}\phi)}\delta(\partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_n}\phi) \right]

将其写为紧凑的求和形式: δS=ddxk=0nL(μ1μkϕ)μ1μk(δϕ)\delta S = \int d^d x \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_k}\phi)} \partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_k}(\delta\phi) (注:当 k=0k=0 时,约定导数项即为场 ϕ\phi 本身)。

为了提取出公共因子 δϕ\delta\phi,我们需要对包含导数的项使用分部积分法(Integration by Parts)。对于第 kk 阶导数项,连续进行 kk 次分部积分,将导数从 δϕ\delta\phi 转移到 L(μ1μkϕ)\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_k}\phi)} 上。每一次分部积分都会引入一个负号,因此 kk 次分部积分会产生因子 (1)k(-1)^kddxL(μ1μkϕ)μ1μk(δϕ)=ddx(1)kμ1μk(L(μ1μkϕ))δϕ+表面项\int d^d x \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_k}\phi)} \partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_k}(\delta\phi) = \int d^d x \, (-1)^k \partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_k} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_k}\phi)} \right) \delta\phi + \text{表面项}

在变分法中,我们要求场在时空边界上的构型是固定的。因此,假设变分 δϕ\delta\phi 及其直到 n1n-1 阶的所有法向导数在积分区域的边界上均严格为零。根据高斯定理,所有散度形式的表面项(边界项)积分后均等于零。

舍弃所有表面项后,作用量的变分化简为: δS=ddx[k=0n(1)kμ1μk(L(μ1μkϕ))]δϕ\delta S = \int d^d x \left[ \sum_{k=0}^{n} (-1)^k \partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_k} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_k}\phi)} \right) \right] \delta\phi

根据最小作用量原理,对于任意的内部变分 δϕ(x)\delta\phi(x),都必须满足 δS=0\delta S = 0。由变分法基本引理(Fundamental Lemma of Calculus of Variations),方括号内的表达式必须在全时空恒为零。

由此,我们得到了包含任意高阶导数的广义欧拉-拉格朗日方程(Generalized Euler-Lagrange equation): k=0n(1)kμ1μ2μk(L(μ1μ2μkϕ))=0\boxed{ \sum_{k=0}^{n} (-1)^k \partial_{\mu_1}\partial_{\mu_2}\dots\partial_{\mu_k} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu_1}\partial_{\mu_2}\dots\partial_{\mu_k}\phi)} \right) = 0 }

展开前几项,该方程的具体形式为: Lϕμ(L(μϕ))+μν(L(μνϕ))+(1)nμ1μn(L(μ1μnϕ))=0\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi} - \partial_\mu \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \right) + \partial_\mu \partial_\nu \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \partial_\nu \phi)} \right) - \dots + (-1)^n \partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_n} \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu_1}\dots\partial_{\mu_n}\phi)} \right) = 0

3.10

Problem 3.10

schwarzChapter 3

习题 3.10

来源: 第3章, PDF第45,46,47,48页


3.10 Graviton polarizations. We will treat the graviton as a symmetric 2-index tensor field. It couples to a current TμνT_{\mu\nu} also symmetric in its two indices, which satisfies the conservation law μTμν=0\partial_{\mu}T_{\mu\nu} = 0.

(a) Assume the Lagrangian is L=12hμνhμν+1MPlhμνTμν\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\square h_{\mu\nu} + \frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}}h_{\mu\nu}T_{\mu\nu}. Solve hμνh_{\mu\nu}'s equations of motion, and substitute back to find an interaction like Tμν1k2TμνT_{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{k^2}T_{\mu\nu}.

(b) Write out the 10 terms in the interaction Tμν1k2TμνT_{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{k^2}T_{\mu\nu} explicitly in terms of T00,T01T_{00}, T_{01}, etc.

(c) Use current conservation to solve for Tμ1T_{\mu 1} in terms of Tμ0,ωT_{\mu 0}, \omega and κ\kappa. Substitute in to simplify the interaction. How many causally propagating degrees of freedom are there?

(d) Add to the interaction another term of the form cTμμ1k2Tννc T_{\mu\mu}\frac{1}{k^2}T_{\nu\nu}. What value of cc can reduce the number of propagating modes? How many are there now?

习题 3.10 - 解答


(a) 设度规约定为 ημν=diag(1,1,1,1)\eta_{\mu\nu} = \text{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1)。给定的拉格朗日量为: L=12hμνhμν+1MPlhμνTμν\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\square h^{\mu\nu} + \frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}}h_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu}hμνh_{\mu\nu} 变分求运动方程(注意 hμνh_{\mu\nu} 是对称张量): LhμναL(αhμν)=0    hμν+1MPlTμν=0\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial h_{\mu\nu}} - \partial_\alpha \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\alpha h_{\mu\nu})} = 0 \implies -\square h_{\mu\nu} + \frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}}T_{\mu\nu} = 0 即运动方程为 hμν=1MPlTμν\square h_{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}}T_{\mu\nu}。 转换到动量空间,k2\square \to -k^2,运动方程变为: k2hμν(k)=1MPlTμν(k)    hμν(k)=1MPlk2Tμν(k)-k^2 h_{\mu\nu}(k) = \frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}}T_{\mu\nu}(k) \implies h_{\mu\nu}(k) = -\frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}k^2}T_{\mu\nu}(k) 将运动方程代回原作用量中以求得有效相互作用。在壳(on-shell)时,动能项可化简为: 12hμνhμν=12hμν(1MPlTμν)-\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu}\square h^{\mu\nu} = -\frac{1}{2}h_{\mu\nu} \left( \frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}}T^{\mu\nu} \right) 因此有效拉格朗日量为: Leff=12MPlhμνTμν+1MPlhμνTμν=12MPlhμνTμν\mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} = -\frac{1}{2M_{\text{Pl}}}h_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu} + \frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}}h_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{2M_{\text{Pl}}}h_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu} 将动量空间中的 hμνh_{\mu\nu} 表达式代入,得到有效相互作用项: Lint=12MPl(1MPlk2Tμν)Tμν=12MPl2Tμν1k2Tμν\mathcal{L}_{\text{int}} = \frac{1}{2M_{\text{Pl}}} \left( -\frac{1}{M_{\text{Pl}}k^2}T_{\mu\nu} \right) T^{\mu\nu} = -\frac{1}{2M_{\text{Pl}}^2} T_{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{k^2}T^{\mu\nu} 这正是形如 Tμν1k2TμνT_{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{k^2}T^{\mu\nu} 的相互作用。

(b)ημν=diag(1,1,1,1)\eta_{\mu\nu} = \text{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1) 约定下,展开 TμνTμνT_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu}。由于 TμνT_{\mu\nu} 是对称张量(Tμν=TνμT_{\mu\nu} = T_{\nu\mu}),且空间分量指标升降会引入负号(T0i=T0iT^{0i} = -T_{0i}, Tij=TijT^{ij} = T_{ij}),我们有: TμνTμν=T002+2T0iT0i+TijTij=T0022T0i2+Tij2T_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu} = T_{00}^2 + 2T_{0i}T^{0i} + T_{ij}T^{ij} = T_{00}^2 - 2T_{0i}^2 + T_{ij}^2 将其完全展开,相互作用 Tμν1k2TμνT_{\mu\nu}\frac{1}{k^2}T^{\mu\nu} 显式包含以下 10 项: 1k2(T0022T0122T0222T032+T112+T222+T332+2T122+2T132+2T232)\boxed{ \frac{1}{k^2} \left( T_{00}^2 - 2T_{01}^2 - 2T_{02}^2 - 2T_{03}^2 + T_{11}^2 + T_{22}^2 + T_{33}^2 + 2T_{12}^2 + 2T_{13}^2 + 2T_{23}^2 \right) }

(c) 流守恒定律 μTμν=0\partial_\mu T^{\mu\nu} = 0 在动量空间中表现为 kμTμν=0k_\mu T^{\mu\nu} = 0。 设引力子沿 x1x^1 方向传播,动量为 kμ=(ω,κ,0,0)k^\mu = (\omega, \kappa, 0, 0),则 kμ=(ω,κ,0,0)k_\mu = (\omega, -\kappa, 0, 0)。 代入守恒方程得到: ωT0νκT1ν=0    T1ν=ωκT0ν\omega T^{0\nu} - \kappa T^{1\nu} = 0 \implies T^{1\nu} = \frac{\omega}{\kappa}T^{0\nu} 利用指标升降关系 T0ν=η0αηνβTαβT_{0\nu} = \eta_{0\alpha}\eta_{\nu\beta}T^{\alpha\beta},我们可以解出所有含指标 1 的下指标分量: T01=T01=T10=ωκT00=ωκT00T_{01} = -T^{01} = -T^{10} = -\frac{\omega}{\kappa}T^{00} = -\frac{\omega}{\kappa}T_{00} T11=T11=ωκT01=ωκ(ωκT00)=ω2κ2T00T_{11} = T^{11} = \frac{\omega}{\kappa}T^{01} = \frac{\omega}{\kappa}\left(-\frac{\omega}{\kappa}T_{00}\right) = \frac{\omega^2}{\kappa^2}T_{00} T12=T12=ωκT02=ωκ(T02)=ωκT02T_{12} = T^{12} = \frac{\omega}{\kappa}T^{02} = \frac{\omega}{\kappa}(-T_{02}) = -\frac{\omega}{\kappa}T_{02} T13=T13=ωκT03=ωκ(T03)=ωκT03T_{13} = T^{13} = \frac{\omega}{\kappa}T^{03} = \frac{\omega}{\kappa}(-T_{03}) = -\frac{\omega}{\kappa}T_{03} 将上述关系代入 (b) 中的 10 项表达式中: TμνTμν=T0022ω2κ2T0022T0222T032+ω4κ4T002+T222+T332+2ω2κ2T022+2ω2κ2T032+2T232T_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu} = T_{00}^2 - 2\frac{\omega^2}{\kappa^2}T_{00}^2 - 2T_{02}^2 - 2T_{03}^2 + \frac{\omega^4}{\kappa^4}T_{00}^2 + T_{22}^2 + T_{33}^2 + 2\frac{\omega^2}{\kappa^2}T_{02}^2 + 2\frac{\omega^2}{\kappa^2}T_{03}^2 + 2T_{23}^2 合并同类项,并利用在壳关系 k2=ω2κ2    1ω2κ2=k2κ2k^2 = \omega^2 - \kappa^2 \implies 1 - \frac{\omega^2}{\kappa^2} = -\frac{k^2}{\kappa^2}T002(1ω2κ2)2=k4κ4T002T_{00}^2 \left( 1 - \frac{\omega^2}{\kappa^2} \right)^2 = \frac{k^4}{\kappa^4}T_{00}^2 2T022(1ω2κ2)=2k2κ2T022(对 T032 同理)-2T_{02}^2 \left( 1 - \frac{\omega^2}{\kappa^2} \right) = 2\frac{k^2}{\kappa^2}T_{02}^2 \quad \text{(对 } T_{03}^2 \text{ 同理)} 化简后的相互作用为: 1k2TμνTμν=k2κ4T002+2κ2(T022+T032)+1k2(T222+T332+2T232)\frac{1}{k^2}T_{\mu\nu}T^{\mu\nu} = \frac{k^2}{\kappa^4}T_{00}^2 + \frac{2}{\kappa^2}(T_{02}^2 + T_{03}^2) + \frac{1}{k^2}(T_{22}^2 + T_{33}^2 + 2T_{23}^2) 因果传播的自由度(Propagating degrees of freedom)对应于具有 1k2\frac{1}{k^2} 极点(pole)的项。极点项为 1k2(T222+T332+2T232)\frac{1}{k^2}(T_{22}^2 + T_{33}^2 + 2T_{23}^2),它由 3 个独立的源分量(T22,T33,T23T_{22}, T_{33}, T_{23})构成。 There are 3 causally propagating degrees of freedom.\boxed{ \text{There are 3 causally propagating degrees of freedom.} }

(d) 现在向相互作用中加入迹项 cTμμ1k2Tννc T^\mu_\mu \frac{1}{k^2} T^\nu_\nu。首先计算源的迹 TμμT^\mu_\muTμμ=T00T11T22T33=T00ω2κ2T00(T22+T33)=k2κ2T00(T22+T33)T^\mu_\mu = T_{00} - T_{11} - T_{22} - T_{33} = T_{00} - \frac{\omega^2}{\kappa^2}T_{00} - (T_{22} + T_{33}) = -\frac{k^2}{\kappa^2}T_{00} - (T_{22} + T_{33}) 将其平方并乘以 ck2\frac{c}{k^2}c1k2(Tμμ)2=ck2κ4T002+2c1κ2T00(T22+T33)+c1k2(T22+T33)2c \frac{1}{k^2} (T^\mu_\mu)^2 = c \frac{k^2}{\kappa^4}T_{00}^2 + 2c \frac{1}{\kappa^2}T_{00}(T_{22} + T_{33}) + c \frac{1}{k^2}(T_{22} + T_{33})^2 新的极点项(包含 1k2\frac{1}{k^2} 的部分)变为原极点项与新极点项之和: Pole term=1k2[T222+T332+2T232+c(T22+T33)2]\text{Pole term} = \frac{1}{k^2} \left[ T_{22}^2 + T_{33}^2 + 2T_{23}^2 + c(T_{22} + T_{33})^2 \right] 将其写为关于 T22T_{22}T33T_{33} 的二次型矩阵形式: (T22T33)(1+ccc1+c)(T22T33)+2T232\begin{pmatrix} T_{22} & T_{33} \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1+c & c \\ c & 1+c \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} T_{22} \\ T_{33} \end{pmatrix} + 2T_{23}^2 为了减少传播模式的数量,该二次型矩阵必须降秩,即其行列式必须为零: det(1+ccc1+c)=(1+c)2c2=1+2c=0    c=12\det \begin{pmatrix} 1+c & c \\ c & 1+c \end{pmatrix} = (1+c)^2 - c^2 = 1 + 2c = 0 \implies c = -\frac{1}{2}c=1/2c = -1/2 时,极点项化简为: 1k2[12T222+12T332T22T33+2T232]=1k2[12(T22T33)2+2T232]\frac{1}{k^2} \left[ \frac{1}{2}T_{22}^2 + \frac{1}{2}T_{33}^2 - T_{22}T_{33} + 2T_{23}^2 \right] = \frac{1}{k^2} \left[ \frac{1}{2}(T_{22} - T_{33})^2 + 2T_{23}^2 \right] 此时,极点项仅依赖于 2 个独立的线性组合:(T22T33)(T_{22} - T_{33})T23T_{23}(这正是引力子的“+”极化和“×\times”极化)。 c=12,There are now 2 propagating modes.\boxed{ c = -\frac{1}{2}, \quad \text{There are now 2 propagating modes.} }

3.2

Problem 3.2

schwarzChapter 3

习题 3.2

来源: 第3章, PDF第42页


3.2 Lorentz currents. (a) Calculate the conserved currents KμναK_{\mu\nu\alpha} associated with (global) Lorentz transformations xμΛμνxνx_\mu \rightarrow \Lambda_{\mu\nu} x_\nu. Express the currents in terms of the energy-momentum tensor. (b) Evaluate the currents for L=12ϕ(+m2)ϕ\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{2} \phi (\square + m^2) \phi. Check that these currents satisfy αKμνα=0\partial_\alpha K_{\mu\nu\alpha} = 0 on the equations of motion. (c) What is the physical interpretation of the conserved quantities Qi=d3xK0i0Q_i = \int d^3 x K_{0i0} associated with boosts? (d) Show that dQidt=0\frac{dQ_i}{dt} = 0 can still be consistent with iQit=[Qi,H]i \frac{\partial Q_i}{\partial t} = [Q_i, H]. Thus, although these charges are conserved, they do not provide invariants for the equations of motion. This is one way to understand why particles have spin, corresponding to representations of the rotation group, and not additional quantum numbers associated with boosts.

习题 3.2 - 解答


(a) Lorentz Currents KμναK_{\mu\nu\alpha}

在全局洛伦兹变换 xμxμ+ω    νμxνx^\mu \rightarrow x^\mu + \omega^\mu_{\;\;\nu} x^\nu(其中 ωμν=ωνμ\omega_{\mu\nu} = -\omega_{\nu\mu} 为无穷小反对称参数)下,根据 Noether 定理,时空对称性对应的守恒流可以通过能量-动量张量 TμαT_{\mu\alpha} 构造。

对于平移不变性,其守恒流为能量-动量张量 TμαT_{\mu\alpha}。洛伦兹变换包含坐标的旋转和推拨(boosts),其对应的 Noether 流不仅包含轨道角动量部分,还可能包含自旋部分。然而,如果使用对称化的能量-动量张量(Belinfante-Rosenfeld 张量,满足 Tμα=TαμT_{\mu\alpha} = T_{\alpha\mu}),自旋贡献会被吸收到轨道部分中。此时,与洛伦兹变换相关的三阶守恒流张量 KμναK_{\mu\nu\alpha} 可以直接由坐标和能量-动量张量表示为: Kμνα=xμTναxνTμα\boxed{ K_{\mu\nu\alpha} = x_\mu T_{\nu\alpha} - x_\nu T_{\mu\alpha} } 其中 α\alpha 是流的指标(满足 αKμνα=0\partial^\alpha K_{\mu\nu\alpha} = 0),μ,ν\mu, \nu 标记洛伦兹群的生成元。


(b) 计算特定拉格朗日量的流并验证守恒律

给定的拉格朗日量为 L=12ϕ(+m2)ϕ\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{2} \phi (\square + m^2) \phi。由于它包含二阶导数 ϕ=ββϕ\square\phi = \partial_\beta \partial^\beta \phi,我们需要使用广义 Noether 定理来计算能量-动量张量: Tμα=L(αϕ)μϕ+L(αβϕ)βμϕβ(L(αβϕ))μϕημαLT_{\mu\alpha} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial^\alpha \phi)} \partial_\mu \phi + \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial^\alpha \partial^\beta \phi)} \partial_\beta \partial_\mu \phi - \partial^\beta \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial^\alpha \partial^\beta \phi)} \right) \partial_\mu \phi - \eta_{\mu\alpha} \mathcal{L} 代入 L=12ϕηρσρσϕ12m2ϕ2\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{2} \phi \eta^{\rho\sigma} \partial_\rho \partial_\sigma \phi - \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2,有: L(αβϕ)=12ϕηαβ,L(αϕ)=0\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial^\alpha \partial^\beta \phi)} = -\frac{1}{2} \phi \eta_{\alpha\beta}, \quad \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial^\alpha \phi)} = 0 计算得到能量-动量张量: Tμα=12ϕμαϕ+12αϕμϕ+12ημαϕ(+m2)ϕT_{\mu\alpha} = -\frac{1}{2} \phi \partial_\mu \partial_\alpha \phi + \frac{1}{2} \partial_\alpha \phi \partial_\mu \phi + \frac{1}{2} \eta_{\mu\alpha} \phi (\square + m^2) \phi 显然,该 TμαT_{\mu\alpha}μ\muα\alpha 上是对称的(Tμα=TαμT_{\mu\alpha} = T_{\alpha\mu})。 对应的洛伦兹流为: Kμνα=xμ(12νϕαϕ12ϕναϕ+ηναL)xν(12μϕαϕ12ϕμαϕ+ημαL)\boxed{ K_{\mu\nu\alpha} = x_\mu \left( \frac{1}{2} \partial_\nu \phi \partial_\alpha \phi - \frac{1}{2} \phi \partial_\nu \partial_\alpha \phi + \eta_{\nu\alpha} \mathcal{L} \right) - x_\nu \left( \frac{1}{2} \partial_\mu \phi \partial_\alpha \phi - \frac{1}{2} \phi \partial_\mu \partial_\alpha \phi + \eta_{\mu\alpha} \mathcal{L} \right) }

验证 αKμνα=0\partial^\alpha K_{\mu\nu\alpha} = 0 首先计算 TμαT_{\mu\alpha} 的散度: αTμα=12αϕμαϕ12ϕμϕ+12ϕμϕ+12αϕμαϕ+12μ(ϕ(+m2)ϕ)=12ϕμϕ+12ϕμϕ+12μϕ(+m2)ϕ+12ϕμ(+m2)ϕ=ϕμϕ+m2ϕμϕ=(ϕ+m2ϕ)μϕ\begin{aligned} \partial^\alpha T_{\mu\alpha} &= -\frac{1}{2} \partial^\alpha \phi \partial_\mu \partial_\alpha \phi - \frac{1}{2} \phi \partial_\mu \square \phi + \frac{1}{2} \square \phi \partial_\mu \phi + \frac{1}{2} \partial^\alpha \phi \partial_\mu \partial_\alpha \phi + \frac{1}{2} \partial_\mu (\phi (\square + m^2) \phi) \\ &= -\frac{1}{2} \phi \partial_\mu \square \phi + \frac{1}{2} \square \phi \partial_\mu \phi + \frac{1}{2} \partial_\mu \phi (\square + m^2) \phi + \frac{1}{2} \phi \partial_\mu (\square + m^2) \phi \\ &= \square \phi \partial_\mu \phi + m^2 \phi \partial_\mu \phi = (\square \phi + m^2 \phi) \partial_\mu \phi \end{aligned} 在运动方程(EOM)ϕ+m2ϕ=0\square \phi + m^2 \phi = 0 成立时,αTμα=0\partial^\alpha T_{\mu\alpha} = 0。 接着计算 KμναK_{\mu\nu\alpha} 的散度: αKμνα=δμαTνα+xμαTναδναTμαxναTμα=TνμTμν+xμαTναxναTμα\partial^\alpha K_{\mu\nu\alpha} = \delta^\alpha_\mu T_{\nu\alpha} + x_\mu \partial^\alpha T_{\nu\alpha} - \delta^\alpha_\nu T_{\mu\alpha} - x_\nu \partial^\alpha T_{\mu\alpha} = T_{\nu\mu} - T_{\mu\nu} + x_\mu \partial^\alpha T_{\nu\alpha} - x_\nu \partial^\alpha T_{\mu\alpha} 由于 TμνT_{\mu\nu} 是对称的(Tνμ=TμνT_{\nu\mu} = T_{\mu\nu}),且在 EOM 下 αTμα=0\partial^\alpha T_{\mu\alpha} = 0,因此: αKμνα=0\boxed{ \partial^\alpha K_{\mu\nu\alpha} = 0 }


(c) 守恒荷 QiQ_i 的物理图像

与推拨(boosts)相关的守恒荷定义为 Qi=d3xK0i0Q_i = \int d^3 x K_{0i0}。展开该表达式: K0i0=x0Ti0xiT00=tT0ixiHK_{0i0} = x_0 T_{i0} - x_i T_{00} = t T_{0i} - x_i \mathcal{H} 积分得到: Qi=td3xT0id3xxiH=tPid3xxiHQ_i = t \int d^3 x T_{0i} - \int d^3 x x_i \mathcal{H} = t P_i - \int d^3 x x_i \mathcal{H} 其中 PiP_i 是系统的总动量,H=T00\mathcal{H} = T_{00} 是哈密顿能量密度。令总能量 E=d3xHE = \int d^3 x \mathcal{H},系统的能量中心定义为 Xi=1Ed3xxiHX_i = \frac{1}{E} \int d^3 x x_i \mathcal{H}。 由于 QiQ_i 是守恒荷,其全导数 dQidt=0\frac{dQ_i}{dt} = 0,这意味着: Piddt(EXi)=0    dXidt=PiEP_i - \frac{d}{dt} (E X_i) = 0 \implies \frac{dX_i}{dt} = \frac{P_i}{E} 物理图像:孤立系统的能量中心(相对论质心)以恒定速度 vi=Pi/E 作匀速直线运动。\boxed{ \text{物理图像:孤立系统的能量中心(相对论质心)以恒定速度 } v_i = P_i / E \text{ 作匀速直线运动。} }


(d) 守恒律与海森堡运动方程的一致性及物理推论

在海森堡绘景中,算符 Qi(t)Q_i(t) 的全时间导数由下式给出: dQidt=Qiti[Qi,H]\frac{dQ_i}{dt} = \frac{\partial Q_i}{\partial t} - i[Q_i, H] 要使荷守恒(dQidt=0\frac{dQ_i}{dt} = 0),必须满足一致性条件 Qit=i[Qi,H]\frac{\partial Q_i}{\partial t} = i[Q_i, H](注:题目中的 iQit=[Qi,H]i\frac{\partial Q_i}{\partial t} = [Q_i, H] 为相差一个 i-i 因子的等价表述或约定差异,此处按标准量子力学对易关系推导)。

验证过程:

  1. 显式时间导数:由 Qi=tPid3xxiHQ_i = t P_i - \int d^3 x x_i \mathcal{H},直接对时间求偏导得 Qit=Pi\frac{\partial Q_i}{\partial t} = P_i
  2. 计算对易子 [Qi,H][Q_i, H][Qi,H]=[tPid3xxiH,H]=[d3xxiH,H][Q_i, H] = \left[ t P_i - \int d^3 x x_i \mathcal{H}, H \right] = -\left[ \int d^3 x x_i \mathcal{H}, H \right] 利用能量-动量守恒 0H=jTj0\partial_0 \mathcal{H} = -\partial_j T^{j0} 以及海森堡方程 0H=i[H,H]\partial_0 \mathcal{H} = i[H, \mathcal{H}],我们有: i[H,d3xxiH]=d3xxi0H=d3xxijTj0i \left[ H, \int d^3 x x_i \mathcal{H} \right] = \int d^3 x x_i \partial_0 \mathcal{H} = -\int d^3 x x_i \partial_j T^{j0} 分部积分(假设边界项为零),并注意空间坐标度规 xi=xi    jxi=δijx_i = -x^i \implies \partial_j x_i = -\delta_{ij}d3xxijTj0=d3x(jxi)Tj0=d3xδijTj0=d3xTi0=Pi=Pi-\int d^3 x x_i \partial_j T^{j0} = \int d^3 x (\partial_j x_i) T^{j0} = -\int d^3 x \delta_{ij} T^{j0} = -\int d^3 x T^{i0} = -P^i = P_i 因此 i[H,d3xxiH]=Pi    [d3xxiH,H]=iPii[H, \int d^3 x x_i \mathcal{H}] = P_i \implies [\int d^3 x x_i \mathcal{H}, H] = i P_i。 代回对易子计算中: [Qi,H]=iPi[Q_i, H] = -i P_i 结合两者,我们得到: Qit=Pi=i(iPi)=i[Qi,H]\boxed{ \frac{\partial Q_i}{\partial t} = P_i = i(-i P_i) = i[Q_i, H] } 这证明了 dQidt=0\frac{dQ_i}{dt} = 0 与海森堡运动方程完全一致。

物理推论: 尽管 QiQ_i 是守恒荷,但由于 [Qi,H]=iPi0[Q_i, H] = -i P_i \neq 0推拨生成元 QiQ_i 与哈密顿量 HH 不对易。 在量子力学中,只有与哈密顿量对易的守恒量才能与能量同时具有确定的本征值(即作为好量子数)。旋转群的生成元(角动量/自旋)在静止系中与 HH 对易,因此粒子可以由质量和自旋来分类(对应庞加莱群的 Casimir 算符)。而推拨荷 QiQ_i 显含时间且与 HH 不对易,无法用于对角化能量本征态,这就是为什么粒子具有自旋量子数,却没有与推拨相关的额外内部量子数的原因。

3.3

Problem 3.3

schwarzChapter 3

习题 3.3

来源: 第3章, PDF第43页


3.3 Ambiguities in the energy-momentum tensor. (a) If you add a total derivative to the Lagrangian LL+μXμ\mathcal{L} \rightarrow \mathcal{L} + \partial_\mu X^\mu, how does the energy-momentum tensor change? (b) Show that the total energy Q=T00d3xQ = \int T_{00} d^3x is invariant under such changes. (c) Show that TμνTνμT_{\mu\nu} \neq T_{\nu\mu} is not symmetric for L=14Fμν2\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu}^2. Can you find an XμX_\mu so that TμνT_{\mu\nu} is symmetric in this case?

习题 3.3 - 解答


下面是对该习题的详细分析与解答。我们采用自然单位制 c==1c=\hbar=1 以及大多数量子场论教材(如 Schwartz)中使用的度规符号约定 ημν=diag(1,1,1,1)\eta_{\mu\nu} = \text{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1)

(a) 作用量加上全导数后能量-动量张量的变化

分析与推导: 根据 Noether 定理,时空平移对称性对应的守恒流即为典范能量-动量张量。对于拉格朗日密度 L(ϕ,μϕ)\mathcal{L}(\phi, \partial_\mu \phi),其典范能量-动量张量定义为: Tμν=L(μϕ)νϕημνLT^{\mu\nu} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \partial^\nu \phi - \eta^{\mu\nu} \mathcal{L}

现在对拉格朗日密度加上一个全导数项:L=L+ρXρ\mathcal{L}' = \mathcal{L} + \partial_\rho X^\rho。通常 XρX^\rho 是场 ϕ\phi 的函数,即 Xρ=Xρ(ϕ)X^\rho = X^\rho(\phi)。 新的典范能量-动量张量 (T)μν(T')^{\mu\nu} 为: (T)μν=L(μϕ)νϕημνL(T')^{\mu\nu} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}'}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \partial^\nu \phi - \eta^{\mu\nu} \mathcal{L}'

利用链式法则展开新动量共轭项: (ρXρ)(μϕ)=(μϕ)(Xρϕρϕ)=Xμϕ\frac{\partial (\partial_\rho X^\rho)}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} = \frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \left( \frac{\partial X^\rho}{\partial \phi} \partial_\rho \phi \right) = \frac{\partial X^\mu}{\partial \phi}

将其代入 (T)μν(T')^{\mu\nu} 的表达式中: (T)μν=(L(μϕ)+Xμϕ)νϕημν(L+ρXρ)(T')^{\mu\nu} = \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} + \frac{\partial X^\mu}{\partial \phi} \right) \partial^\nu \phi - \eta^{\mu\nu} (\mathcal{L} + \partial_\rho X^\rho) (T)μν=[L(μϕ)νϕημνL]+XμϕνϕημνρXρ(T')^{\mu\nu} = \left[ \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \partial^\nu \phi - \eta^{\mu\nu} \mathcal{L} \right] + \frac{\partial X^\mu}{\partial \phi} \partial^\nu \phi - \eta^{\mu\nu} \partial_\rho X^\rho

注意到方括号内正是原能量-动量张量 TμνT^{\mu\nu},且 Xμϕνϕ=νXμ\frac{\partial X^\mu}{\partial \phi} \partial^\nu \phi = \partial^\nu X^\mu。因此,能量-动量张量的变化量 ΔTμν=(T)μνTμν\Delta T^{\mu\nu} = (T')^{\mu\nu} - T^{\mu\nu} 为: ΔTμν=νXμημνρXρ\boxed{ \Delta T^{\mu\nu} = \partial^\nu X^\mu - \eta^{\mu\nu} \partial_\rho X^\rho }


(b) 证明总能量 QQ 在此变换下是不变的

分析与推导: 总能量定义为能量-动量张量 0000 分量的全空间积分:Q=T00d3xQ = \int T^{00} d^3x。 我们需要证明 ΔQ=ΔT00d3x=0\Delta Q = \int \Delta T^{00} d^3x = 0

根据 (a) 的结果,取 μ=0,ν=0\mu=0, \nu=0ΔT00=0X0η00ρXρ\Delta T^{00} = \partial^0 X^0 - \eta^{00} \partial_\rho X^\rhoημν=diag(1,1,1,1)\eta_{\mu\nu} = \text{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1) 约定下,η00=1\eta^{00} = 1,且 0=0\partial^0 = \partial_0。展开散度项 ρXρ=0X0+iXi\partial_\rho X^\rho = \partial_0 X^0 + \partial_i X^i (其中 i=1,2,3i=1,2,3 为空间分量): ΔT00=0X0(0X0+iXi)=iXi=X\Delta T^{00} = \partial_0 X^0 - (\partial_0 X^0 + \partial_i X^i) = -\partial_i X^i = -\nabla \cdot \mathbf{X}

对全空间进行积分,并利用高斯散度定理: ΔQ=ΔT00d3x=Xd3x=SXdS\Delta Q = \int \Delta T^{00} d^3x = -\int \nabla \cdot \mathbf{X} d^3x = -\oint_{S \to \infty} \mathbf{X} \cdot d\mathbf{S} 在物理上,我们要求场在空间无穷远处衰减得足够快,因此无穷远处的面积分为零。由此可得: ΔQ=0    Q=Q\boxed{ \Delta Q = 0 \implies Q' = Q } 这表明总能量是一个不依赖于拉格朗日全导数项的物理可观测量。


(c) 电磁场能量-动量张量的对称性与 XμX_\mu 的寻找

分析与推导: 对于自由电磁场,拉格朗日密度为 L=14FρσFρσ\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\rho\sigma} F^{\rho\sigma},其中 Fρσ=ρAσσAρF_{\rho\sigma} = \partial_\rho A_\sigma - \partial_\sigma A_\rho。 将场变量替换为 AλA_\lambda,计算其典范能量-动量张量: L(μAλ)=Fμλ\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu A_\lambda)} = -F^{\mu\lambda} Tμν=FμλνAλημν(14FρσFρσ)=FμλνAλ+14ημνF2T^{\mu\nu} = -F^{\mu\lambda} \partial^\nu A_\lambda - \eta^{\mu\nu} \left(-\frac{1}{4} F_{\rho\sigma} F^{\rho\sigma}\right) = -F^{\mu\lambda} \partial^\nu A_\lambda + \frac{1}{4} \eta^{\mu\nu} F^2

第一步:证明 TμνT^{\mu\nu} 不对称 交换指标 μν\mu \leftrightarrow \nuTνμ=FνλμAλ+14ηνμF2T^{\nu\mu} = -F^{\nu\lambda} \partial^\mu A_\lambda + \frac{1}{4} \eta^{\nu\mu} F^2 由于 FμλνAλFνλμAλ-F^{\mu\lambda} \partial^\nu A_\lambda \neq -F^{\nu\lambda} \partial^\mu A_\lambda(即第一项在 μ,ν\mu, \nu 交换下不对称),显然有: TμνTνμ\boxed{ T^{\mu\nu} \neq T^{\nu\mu} }

第二步:能否找到 XμX^\mu 使其对称? 题目询问是否可以通过在拉格朗日量中添加 ρXρ\partial_\rho X^\rho 来找到一个 XμX^\mu,使得新的张量对称。 如果存在这样的 XμX^\mu,则必须满足 Tμν+ΔTμνT^{\mu\nu} + \Delta T^{\mu\nu} 是对称的。 已知在电磁学中,使张量对称且规范不变的正确做法是加上一项 λ(FμλAν)\partial_\lambda (F^{\mu\lambda} A^\nu)(在壳条件下,这等价于 Belinfante-Rosenfeld 过程)。我们来检验 ΔTμν\Delta T^{\mu\nu} 能否等于这一项: 假设 νXμημνρXρ=λ(FμλAν)\partial^\nu X^\mu - \eta^{\mu\nu} \partial_\rho X^\rho = \partial_\lambda (F^{\mu\lambda} A^\nu)。 对两边取迹(乘以 ημν\eta_{\mu\nu}): 左边迹为:μXμ4ρXρ=3ρXρ\partial_\mu X^\mu - 4 \partial_\rho X^\rho = -3 \partial_\rho X^\rho。 右边迹为:λ(FμλAμ)=(λFμλ)Aμ+FμλλAμ\partial_\lambda (F^{\mu\lambda} A_\mu) = (\partial_\lambda F^{\mu\lambda}) A_\mu + F^{\mu\lambda} \partial_\lambda A_\mu。 利用运动方程 λFμλ=0\partial_\lambda F^{\mu\lambda} = 0 以及 FμλF^{\mu\lambda} 的反对称性,右边等于 12FμλFλμ=12F2\frac{1}{2} F^{\mu\lambda} F_{\lambda\mu} = \frac{1}{2} F^2。 因此必须有:3ρXρ=12F2    ρXρ=16F2-3 \partial_\rho X^\rho = \frac{1}{2} F^2 \implies \partial_\rho X^\rho = -\frac{1}{6} F^2。 将其代回原假设方程,得到对 XμX^\mu 梯度的要求: νXμ=λ(FμλAν)16ημνF2\partial^\nu X^\mu = \partial_\lambda (F^{\mu\lambda} A^\nu) - \frac{1}{6} \eta^{\mu\nu} F^2 如果 XμX^\mu 存在,上式右侧必须是一个无旋场(即满足二阶导数交换律 ανXμ=ναXμ\partial^\alpha \partial^\nu X^\mu = \partial^\nu \partial^\alpha X^\mu)。然而,右侧对 ν\nu 取旋度显然不为零(因为 AνA^\nu 是任意的动力学场,其导数项无法完全抵消)。

结论: 不能通过在拉格朗日量中添加全导数 μXμ\partial_\mu X^\mu 来对称化能量-动量张量。 No, such an Xμ does not exist.\boxed{ \text{No, such an } X_\mu \text{ does not exist.} } (物理注记:要对称化 TμνT^{\mu\nu},必须直接对能量-动量张量本身进行修改,即加上一个反对称张量的散度 ΔTμν=λKλμν\Delta T^{\mu\nu} = \partial_\lambda K^{\lambda\mu\nu},其中 Kλμν=FμλAνK^{\lambda\mu\nu} = F^{\mu\lambda}A^\nu。这被称为 Belinfante-Rosenfeld 对称化过程,它不来源于拉格朗日量中的 XμX^\mu 全导数项。)

3.4

Problem 3.4

schwarzChapter 3

习题 3.4

来源: 第3章, PDF第43页


3.4 Write down the next-order diagrams in Eq. (3.85) and their corresponding integral expressions using Feynman rules. Check that your answer is correct by using the Green's function method.

Referenced Equations:

Equation (3.85):

Feynman diagram representation of the solution for the field h(x), showing a single propagator term and a vertex term with three propagators connected to sources J(y) and J(z).
(3.85)\tag{3.85}

习题 3.4 - 解答


题目分析与物理背景

给定的等式 (3.85) 展示了经典场 h(x)h(x) 在存在源 JJ 和非线性相互作用时的树图(tree-level)展开。这种展开通常对应于求解非线性微分方程(如经典运动方程)的微扰迭代解。

从图中可以看出:

  1. 第一项是 O(J)\mathcal{O}(J) 的线性响应,对应于传播子连接点 xx 和源 J(y)J(y)
  2. 第二项是 O(J2)\mathcal{O}(J^2) 的非线性项,包含一个三线顶点(3-point vertex),将点 xx 连接到两个源 J(y)J(y)J(z)J(z)

这暗示了该场满足一个带有二次非线性项的运动方程。为了保持一般性,我们假设运动方程具有如下形式: Dxh(x)=J(x)+λ32h(x)2+λ43!h(x)3+\mathcal{D}_x h(x) = J(x) + \frac{\lambda_3}{2} h(x)^2 + \frac{\lambda_4}{3!} h(x)^3 + \dots 其中 Dx\mathcal{D}_x 是线性微分算符(例如 +m2\Box + m^2),λ3,λ4\lambda_3, \lambda_4 是相互作用耦合常数。

题目要求写出“下一阶”(next-order)的图及其积分表达式。已知图分别是 O(J)\mathcal{O}(J)O(J2)\mathcal{O}(J^2),因此下一阶是 O(J3)\mathcal{O}(J^3),即包含三个源 JJ 的图。

根据相互作用的类型,O(J3)\mathcal{O}(J^3) 的树图有两种可能的拓扑结构:

  1. 包含两个三线顶点的图(由 h2h^2 项的二次迭代产生)。
  2. 包含一个四线顶点的图(如果理论中存在 h3h^3 相互作用项)。

解答过程

1. 下一阶 Feynman 图的描述与积分表达式

根据 Feynman 规则,我们定义:

  • 传播子 (Propagator): G(x,y)G(x,y),对应图中的波浪线。
  • 源 (Source): d4yJ(y)\int d^4y J(y),对应图中的星形符号。
  • 三线顶点 (3-point vertex): λ3d4w\lambda_3 \int d^4w,对应三条波浪线交汇点。
  • 四线顶点 (4-point vertex): λ4d4w\lambda_4 \int d^4w,对应四条波浪线交汇点。

图 A(两个三线顶点):

  • 结构描述:一条波浪线从 xx 出发到达内部顶点 w1w_1。在 w1w_1 处,线分为两支:一支连接到源 J(y1)J(y_1),另一支连接到第二个内部顶点 w2w_2。在 w2w_2 处,线再次分为两支,分别连接到源 J(y2)J(y_2)J(y3)J(y_3)
  • 对称性因子 (Symmetry Factor):交换连接在 w2w_2 上的两个分支(即交换 y2y_2y3y_3)图保持不变,因此对称性因子 S=2S = 2
  • 积分表达式λ322d4w1d4w2d4y1d4y2d4y3G(x,w1)G(w1,y1)J(y1)G(w1,w2)G(w2,y2)J(y2)G(w2,y3)J(y3)\frac{\lambda_3^2}{2} \int d^4w_1 d^4w_2 d^4y_1 d^4y_2 d^4y_3 \, G(x,w_1) G(w_1,y_1) J(y_1) G(w_1,w_2) G(w_2,y_2) J(y_2) G(w_2,y_3) J(y_3)

图 B(一个四线顶点,若理论包含此相互作用):

  • 结构描述:一条波浪线从 xx 出发到达内部顶点 ww。在 ww 处,线分为三支,分别连接到三个源 J(y1),J(y2),J(y3)J(y_1), J(y_2), J(y_3)
  • 对称性因子:交换连接在 ww 上的三个分支图保持不变,因此对称性因子 S=3!=6S = 3! = 6
  • 积分表达式λ46d4wd4y1d4y2d4y3G(x,w)G(w,y1)J(y1)G(w,y2)J(y2)G(w,y3)J(y3)\frac{\lambda_4}{6} \int d^4w d^4y_1 d^4y_2 d^4y_3 \, G(x,w) G(w,y_1) J(y_1) G(w,y_2) J(y_2) G(w,y_3) J(y_3)

(注:如果题目隐含的理论仅包含三线相互作用(如 ϕ3\phi^3 理论),则只有图 A 存在。)

2. 使用格林函数方法 (Green's function method) 验证

我们将运动方程转化为积分方程: h(x)=d4yG(x,y)[J(y)+λ32h(y)2+λ43!h(y)3+]h(x) = \int d^4y \, G(x,y) \left[ J(y) + \frac{\lambda_3}{2} h(y)^2 + \frac{\lambda_4}{3!} h(y)^3 + \dots \right]

我们通过对源 JJ 的阶数进行微扰展开来迭代求解:h(x)=h(1)(x)+h(2)(x)+h(3)(x)+h(x) = h^{(1)}(x) + h^{(2)}(x) + h^{(3)}(x) + \dots

一阶 O(J)\mathcal{O}(J): h(1)(x)=d4yG(x,y)J(y)h^{(1)}(x) = \int d^4y \, G(x,y) J(y) 这正是等式 (3.85) 中的第一项。

二阶 O(J2)\mathcal{O}(J^2):hh(1)h \approx h^{(1)} 代入 h2h^2 项: h(2)(x)=λ32d4wG(x,w)[h(1)(w)]2h^{(2)}(x) = \frac{\lambda_3}{2} \int d^4w \, G(x,w) \left[ h^{(1)}(w) \right]^2 h(2)(x)=λ32d4wG(x,w)(d4yG(w,y)J(y))(d4zG(w,z)J(z))h^{(2)}(x) = \frac{\lambda_3}{2} \int d^4w \, G(x,w) \left( \int d^4y \, G(w,y) J(y) \right) \left( \int d^4z \, G(w,z) J(z) \right) 这正是等式 (3.85) 中的第二项。

三阶 O(J3)\mathcal{O}(J^3): 为了得到三阶项,我们需要展开非线性项到 O(J3)\mathcal{O}(J^3)

  • 对于 h2h^2 项:(h(1)+h(2)+)2(h(1))2+2h(1)h(2)+(h^{(1)} + h^{(2)} + \dots)^2 \approx (h^{(1)})^2 + 2 h^{(1)} h^{(2)} + \dots,其中 2h(1)h(2)2 h^{(1)} h^{(2)}O(J3)\mathcal{O}(J^3) 的。
  • 对于 h3h^3 项:(h(1)+)3(h(1))3(h^{(1)} + \dots)^3 \approx (h^{(1)})^3,这是 O(J3)\mathcal{O}(J^3) 的。

将这些代入积分方程: h(3)(x)=d4w1G(x,w1)[λ32(2h(1)(w1)h(2)(w1))+λ43!(h(1)(w1))3]h^{(3)}(x) = \int d^4w_1 \, G(x,w_1) \left[ \frac{\lambda_3}{2} \left( 2 h^{(1)}(w_1) h^{(2)}(w_1) \right) + \frac{\lambda_4}{3!} \left( h^{(1)}(w_1) \right)^3 \right] h(3)(x)=λ3d4w1G(x,w1)h(1)(w1)h(2)(w1)+λ46d4wG(x,w)(h(1)(w))3h^{(3)}(x) = \lambda_3 \int d^4w_1 \, G(x,w_1) h^{(1)}(w_1) h^{(2)}(w_1) + \frac{\lambda_4}{6} \int d^4w \, G(x,w) \left( h^{(1)}(w) \right)^3

现在,将 h(1)h^{(1)}h(2)h^{(2)} 的表达式代入第一项中: λ3d4w1G(x,w1)(d4y1G(w1,y1)J(y1))[λ32d4w2G(w1,w2)(d4y2G(w2,y2)J(y2))(d4y3G(w2,y3)J(y3))]\lambda_3 \int d^4w_1 \, G(x,w_1) \left( \int d^4y_1 \, G(w_1,y_1) J(y_1) \right) \left[ \frac{\lambda_3}{2} \int d^4w_2 \, G(w_1,w_2) \left( \int d^4y_2 \, G(w_2,y_2) J(y_2) \right) \left( \int d^4y_3 \, G(w_2,y_3) J(y_3) \right) \right] 整理积分变量,得到: λ322d4w1d4w2d4y1d4y2d4y3G(x,w1)G(w1,y1)J(y1)G(w1,w2)G(w2,y2)J(y2)G(w2,y3)J(y3)\frac{\lambda_3^2}{2} \int d^4w_1 d^4w_2 d^4y_1 d^4y_2 d^4y_3 \, G(x,w_1) G(w_1,y_1) J(y_1) G(w_1,w_2) G(w_2,y_2) J(y_2) G(w_2,y_3) J(y_3) 这完全匹配了我们通过 Feynman 规则写出的图 A 的表达式。

h(1)h^{(1)} 的表达式代入第二项中: λ46d4wG(x,w)(d4y1G(w,y1)J(y1))(d4y2G(w,y2)J(y2))(d4y3G(w,y3)J(y3))\frac{\lambda_4}{6} \int d^4w \, G(x,w) \left( \int d^4y_1 \, G(w,y_1) J(y_1) \right) \left( \int d^4y_2 \, G(w,y_2) J(y_2) \right) \left( \int d^4y_3 \, G(w,y_3) J(y_3) \right) 整理后得到: λ46d4wd4y1d4y2d4y3G(x,w)G(w,y1)J(y1)G(w,y2)J(y2)G(w,y3)J(y3)\frac{\lambda_4}{6} \int d^4w d^4y_1 d^4y_2 d^4y_3 \, G(x,w) G(w,y_1) J(y_1) G(w,y_2) J(y_2) G(w,y_3) J(y_3) 这完全匹配了我们通过 Feynman 规则写出的图 B 的表达式。

通过格林函数迭代法,我们严格证明了由 Feynman 规则直接写出的积分表达式是正确的。

h(3)(x)=λ322d4w1d4w2d4y1d4y2d4y3G(x,w1)G(w1,w2)G(w1,y1)G(w2,y2)G(w2,y3)J(y1)J(y2)J(y3)+λ46d4wd4y1d4y2d4y3G(x,w)G(w,y1)G(w,y2)G(w,y3)J(y1)J(y2)J(y3)\boxed{ \begin{aligned} h^{(3)}(x) &= \frac{\lambda_3^2}{2} \int d^4w_1 d^4w_2 d^4y_1 d^4y_2 d^4y_3 \, G(x,w_1) G(w_1,w_2) G(w_1,y_1) G(w_2,y_2) G(w_2,y_3) J(y_1) J(y_2) J(y_3) \\ &\quad + \frac{\lambda_4}{6} \int d^4w d^4y_1 d^4y_2 d^4y_3 \, G(x,w) G(w,y_1) G(w,y_2) G(w,y_3) J(y_1) J(y_2) J(y_3) \end{aligned} }
3.5

Problem 3.5

schwarzChapter 3

习题 3.5

来源: 第3章, PDF第43页


3.5 Spontaneous symmetry breaking is an important subject, to be discussed in depth in Chapter 28. A simple classical example that demonstrates spontaneous symmetry breaking is described by the Lagrangian for a scalar with a negative mass term:

L=12ϕϕ+12m2ϕ2λ4!ϕ4.(3.86)\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{2} \phi \square \phi + \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2 - \frac{\lambda}{4!} \phi^4. \tag{3.86}

(a) How many constants cc can you find for which ϕ(x)=c\phi(x) = c is a solution to the equations of motion? Which solution has the lowest energy (the ground state)? (b) The Lagrangian has a symmetry under ϕϕ\phi \rightarrow -\phi. Show that this symmetry is not respected by the ground state. We say the vacuum expectation value of ϕ\phi is cc, and write ϕ=c\langle \phi \rangle = c. In this vacuum, the Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 symmetry ϕϕ\phi \rightarrow -\phi is spontaneously broken. (c) Write ϕ(x)=c+π(x)\phi(x) = c + \pi(x) and substitute back into the Lagrangian. Show that now π=0\pi = 0 is a solution to the equations of motion. How does π\pi transform under the Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 symmetry ϕϕ\phi \rightarrow -\phi? Show that this is a symmetry of π\pi's Lagrangian.

习题 3.5 - 解答


本题探讨了经典标量场论中的自发对称性破缺(Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, SSB)机制。拉格朗日量中具有“错误”符号的质量项(即 +12m2ϕ2+ \frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2)会导致平凡真空失稳,从而产生简并的基态。

(a) 寻找常数解及最低能量基态

首先,由作用量 S=d4xLS = \int d^4x \mathcal{L} 变分推导运动方程(Euler-Lagrange 方程)。对拉格朗日量 L=12ϕϕ+12m2ϕ2λ4!ϕ4\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{2} \phi \square \phi + \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2 - \frac{\lambda}{4!} \phi^4 进行变分(注意分部积分 ϕδϕ=δϕϕ\int \phi \square \delta\phi = \int \delta\phi \square \phi),得到运动方程:

ϕ+m2ϕλ3!ϕ3=0-\square \phi + m^2 \phi - \frac{\lambda}{3!} \phi^3 = 0

假设 ϕ(x)=c\phi(x) = c 为常数解,则 c=0\square c = 0,代入运动方程得到:

m2cλ6c3=0    c(m2λ6c2)=0m^2 c - \frac{\lambda}{6} c^3 = 0 \implies c \left( m^2 - \frac{\lambda}{6} c^2 \right) = 0

解此代数方程,可以得到 3 个常数解

c1=0,c2=6m2λ,c3=6m2λc_1 = 0, \quad c_2 = \sqrt{\frac{6m^2}{\lambda}}, \quad c_3 = -\sqrt{\frac{6m^2}{\lambda}}

对于常数场 ϕ(x)=c\phi(x) = c,其动能项为零,系统的能量密度完全由势能 V(ϕ)V(\phi) 决定。拉格朗日量可写为 L=TV\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{T} - \mathcal{V},因此势能为:

V(ϕ)=12m2ϕ2+λ24ϕ4V(\phi) = -\frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2 + \frac{\lambda}{24} \phi^4

分别计算这三个解对应的能量密度:

  1. 对于 c1=0c_1 = 0V(0)=0V(0) = 0
  2. 对于 c2,3=±6m2λc_{2,3} = \pm \sqrt{\frac{6m^2}{\lambda}}V(±6m2λ)=12m2(6m2λ)+λ24(36m4λ2)=3m4λ+3m42λ=3m42λV\left(\pm \sqrt{\frac{6m^2}{\lambda}}\right) = -\frac{1}{2} m^2 \left(\frac{6m^2}{\lambda}\right) + \frac{\lambda}{24} \left(\frac{36m^4}{\lambda^2}\right) = -\frac{3m^4}{\lambda} + \frac{3m^4}{2\lambda} = -\frac{3m^4}{2\lambda}

因为 m2,λ>0m^2, \lambda > 0,显然 3m42λ<0-\frac{3m^4}{2\lambda} < 0。因此,具有最低能量(基态)的解为:

c=±6m2λ\boxed{c = \pm \sqrt{\frac{6m^2}{\lambda}}}

(b) 基态对 Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 对称性的破缺

原拉格朗日量 L(ϕ)\mathcal{L}(\phi) 仅包含 ϕ\phi 的偶次幂,因此在离散的 Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 变换 ϕϕ\phi \rightarrow -\phi 下是严格不变的。

然而,系统的基态(真空)必须选择最低能量解中的某一个,例如选择 c=+6m2λc = +\sqrt{\frac{6m^2}{\lambda}}。 在 Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 变换 ϕϕ\phi \rightarrow -\phi 下,该基态的真空期望值变换为:

ϕ=cϕϕϕ=c\langle \phi \rangle = c \xrightarrow{\phi \rightarrow -\phi} \langle -\phi \rangle = -c

由于 c0c \neq 0,变换后的状态 c-c 是与原状态 cc 不同的另一个简并基态。这意味着基态本身并不具有拉格朗日量所具有的 Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 对称性。这种拉格朗日量具有某种对称性,但系统的基态不具有该对称性的现象,即为自发对称性破缺。

(c) 围绕真实真空的微扰展开与对称性

ϕ(x)=c+π(x)\phi(x) = c + \pi(x),其中 c=±6m2λc = \pm \sqrt{\frac{6m^2}{\lambda}} 是基态真空期望值,π(x)\pi(x) 是真空上的量子涨落。将其代入原拉格朗日量:

Lπ=12(c+π)(c+π)+12m2(c+π)2λ24(c+π)4\mathcal{L}_\pi = -\frac{1}{2} (c+\pi) \square (c+\pi) + \frac{1}{2} m^2 (c+\pi)^2 - \frac{\lambda}{24} (c+\pi)^4

展开各项:

  1. 动能项:12cc12cπ12πc12ππ-\frac{1}{2} c \square c - \frac{1}{2} c \square \pi - \frac{1}{2} \pi \square c - \frac{1}{2} \pi \square \pi。由于 cc 是常数,c=0\square c = 0。交叉项 12cπ=12μ(cμπ)-\frac{1}{2} c \square \pi = -\frac{1}{2} \partial_\mu (c \partial^\mu \pi) 是全导数项,在作用量中积分为零,可舍去。故动能项化简为 12ππ-\frac{1}{2} \pi \square \pi
  2. 势能项展开并按 π\pi 的幂次合并:
    • π0\pi^0 项(常数项):12m2c2λ24c4=3m42λ\frac{1}{2} m^2 c^2 - \frac{\lambda}{24} c^4 = -\frac{3m^4}{2\lambda}
    • π1\pi^1 项(线性项):m2cπ4λ24c3π=π(m2cλ6c3)m^2 c \pi - \frac{4\lambda}{24} c^3 \pi = \pi \left( m^2 c - \frac{\lambda}{6} c^3 \right)。由于 cc 满足运动方程 m2cλ6c3=0m^2 c - \frac{\lambda}{6} c^3 = 0线性项严格为零
    • π2\pi^2 项(质量项):12m2π26λ24c2π2=12(m2λ2c2)π2\frac{1}{2} m^2 \pi^2 - \frac{6\lambda}{24} c^2 \pi^2 = \frac{1}{2} \left( m^2 - \frac{\lambda}{2} c^2 \right) \pi^2。代入 c2=6m2λc^2 = \frac{6m^2}{\lambda},系数变为 12(m23m2)=m2\frac{1}{2} (m^2 - 3m^2) = -m^2
    • π3\pi^3 项(三次相互作用):4λ24cπ3=λc6π3-\frac{4\lambda}{24} c \pi^3 = -\frac{\lambda c}{6} \pi^3
    • π4\pi^4 项(四次相互作用):λ24π4-\frac{\lambda}{24} \pi^4

新的拉格朗日量为:

Lπ=12ππm2π2λc6π3λ24π43m42λ\mathcal{L}_\pi = -\frac{1}{2} \pi \square \pi - m^2 \pi^2 - \frac{\lambda c}{6} \pi^3 - \frac{\lambda}{24} \pi^4 - \frac{3m^4}{2\lambda}

对应的 π\pi 场的运动方程为:

π2m2πλc2π2λ6π3=0-\square \pi - 2m^2 \pi - \frac{\lambda c}{2} \pi^2 - \frac{\lambda}{6} \pi^3 = 0

由于拉格朗日量中不存在 π\pi 的线性项,运动方程中不存在非零常数驱动项。因此,显然有:

π=0 是该运动方程的一个解\boxed{\pi = 0 \text{ 是该运动方程的一个解}}

这在物理上意味着 π=0\pi=0 对应于系统的势能极小值(稳定的真空)。注意此时 π\pi 场获得了正确的正质量平方 Mπ2=2m2>0M_\pi^2 = 2m^2 > 0

π\pi 场的变换规律: 在原 Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 对称性 ϕϕ\phi \rightarrow -\phi 下,代入 ϕ=c+π\phi = c + \pi,得到 c+π(c+π)=cπc + \pi \rightarrow -(c + \pi) = -c - \pi。 因此,π\pi 场的变换规则为:

π2cπ\boxed{\pi \rightarrow -2c - \pi}

证明这是 Lπ\mathcal{L}_\pi 的对称性: 我们可以直接利用原拉格朗日量的对称性进行证明,而无需重新代数展开。根据定义,新拉格朗日量 Lπ(π)\mathcal{L}_\pi(\pi) 仅仅是原拉格朗日量平移后的结果:

Lπ(π)L(c+π)\mathcal{L}_\pi(\pi) \equiv \mathcal{L}(c + \pi)

π\pi 施加变换 π2cπ\pi \rightarrow -2c - \pi,我们考察新拉格朗日量的变化:

Lπ(2cπ)=L(c+(2cπ))=L(cπ)=L((c+π))\mathcal{L}_\pi(-2c - \pi) = \mathcal{L}\big(c + (-2c - \pi)\big) = \mathcal{L}(-c - \pi) = \mathcal{L}\big(-(c + \pi)\big)

由于原拉格朗日量具有 Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 对称性,即对于任意场位形 Φ\Phi 都有 L(Φ)=L(Φ)\mathcal{L}(-\Phi) = \mathcal{L}(\Phi)。令 Φ=c+π\Phi = c + \pi,则有:

L((c+π))=L(c+π)Lπ(π)\mathcal{L}\big(-(c + \pi)\big) = \mathcal{L}(c + \pi) \equiv \mathcal{L}_\pi(\pi)

因此,Lπ(2cπ)=Lπ(π)\mathcal{L}_\pi(-2c - \pi) = \mathcal{L}_\pi(\pi)

变换 π2cπ 是 π 场拉格朗日量 Lπ 的精确对称性\boxed{\text{变换 } \pi \rightarrow -2c - \pi \text{ 是 } \pi \text{ 场拉格朗日量 } \mathcal{L}_\pi \text{ 的精确对称性}}

这表明,尽管自发对称性破缺使得真空不再具有原对称性,但对称性并没有消失,而是以一种非线性的隐藏形式(即包含场平移的变换 π2cπ\pi \rightarrow -2c - \pi)保留在破缺后的拉格朗日量中。

3.6

Problem 3.6

schwarzChapter 3

习题 3.6

来源: 第3章, PDF第43页


3.6 Yukawa potential. (a) Calculate the equations of motion for a massive vector AμA_\mu from the Lagrangian

L=14Fμν2+12m2Aμ2AμJμ,(3.87)\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu}^2 + \frac{1}{2} m^2 A_\mu^2 - A_\mu J^\mu, \tag{3.87}

where Fμν=μAννAμF_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu. Assuming μJμ=0\partial_\mu J^\mu = 0, use the equations to find a constraint on AμA_\mu. (b) For JμJ_\mu the current of a point charge, show that the equation of motion for A0A_0 reduces to

A0(r)=e4π2irkdkk2+m2eikr.(3.88)A_0(r) = \frac{e}{4\pi^2 i r} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{k dk}{k^2 + m^2} e^{ikr}. \tag{3.88}

(c) Evaluate this integral with contour integration to get an explicit form for A0(r)A_0(r). (d) Show that as m0m \rightarrow 0 you reproduce the Coulomb potential. (e) In 1935 Yukawa speculated that this potential might explain what holds protons together in the nucleus. What qualitative features does this Yukawa potential have, compared to a Coulomb potential, that make it a good candidate for the force between protons? What value for mm might be appropriate (in MeV)? (f) Plug the constraint on AμA_\mu that you found in part (a) back into the Lagrangian, simplify, then rederive the equations of motion. Can you still find the constraint? What is acting as a Lagrange multiplier in Eq. (3.87)?

习题 3.6 - 解答


(a) The Lagrangian is given by L=14FμνFμν+12m2AμAμAμJμ\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} + \frac{1}{2} m^2 A_\mu A^\mu - A_\mu J^\mu The Euler-Lagrange equation for the field AνA_\nu is μL(μAν)LAν=0\partial_\mu \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu A_\nu)} - \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial A_\nu} = 0 Using (μAν)(14FρσFρσ)=Fμν\frac{\partial}{\partial (\partial_\mu A_\nu)} \left( -\frac{1}{4} F_{\rho\sigma} F^{\rho\sigma} \right) = -F^{\mu\nu}, we obtain the equations of motion: μFμν+m2Aν=Jν\partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu} + m^2 A^\nu = J^\nu To find the constraint on AμA_\mu, take the four-divergence ν\partial_\nu of the equations of motion: νμFμν+m2νAν=νJν\partial_\nu \partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu} + m^2 \partial_\nu A^\nu = \partial_\nu J^\nu Since FμνF^{\mu\nu} is antisymmetric (Fμν=FνμF^{\mu\nu} = -F^{\nu\mu}) and partial derivatives commute, the term νμFμν\partial_\nu \partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu} vanishes identically. Given the current conservation νJν=0\partial_\nu J^\nu = 0, the equation simplifies to: m2νAν=0m^2 \partial_\nu A^\nu = 0 Assuming m0m \neq 0, we obtain the constraint: μAμ=0\boxed{\partial_\mu A^\mu = 0}

(b) For a static point charge ee at the origin, the current density is Jμ=(eδ(3)(r),0)J^\mu = (e \delta^{(3)}(\mathbf{r}), \mathbf{0}). The equation of motion for the ν=0\nu = 0 component is: iFi0+m2A0=J0\partial_i F^{i0} + m^2 A^0 = J^0 where Fi0=iA00Ai=iA00AiF^{i0} = \partial^i A^0 - \partial^0 A^i = -\nabla^i A^0 - \partial^0 A^i. Since the source is static, we seek a static solution where time derivatives vanish (0Aμ=0\partial_0 A^\mu = 0). The constraint μAμ=0\partial_\mu A^\mu = 0 also implies A=0\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} = 0. The equation of motion for A0=A0A^0 = A_0 becomes: 2A0+m2A0=eδ(3)(r)-\nabla^2 A_0 + m^2 A_0 = e \delta^{(3)}(\mathbf{r}) To solve this, perform a spatial Fourier transform A0(r)=d3k(2π)3A~0(k)eikrA_0(\mathbf{r}) = \int \frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3} \tilde{A}_0(\mathbf{k}) e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}: (k2+m2)A~0(k)=e    A~0(k)=ek2+m2(\mathbf{k}^2 + m^2) \tilde{A}_0(\mathbf{k}) = e \implies \tilde{A}_0(\mathbf{k}) = \frac{e}{\mathbf{k}^2 + m^2} Substitute this back into the inverse Fourier transform and use spherical coordinates in momentum space, aligning the polar axis with r\mathbf{r}: A0(r)=e(2π)30k2dk0πsinθdθ02πdϕeikrcosθk2+m2A_0(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{e}{(2\pi)^3} \int_0^\infty k^2 dk \int_0^\pi \sin\theta d\theta \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi \frac{e^{ikr\cos\theta}}{k^2 + m^2} Integrating over the angles θ\theta and ϕ\phi: A0(r)=e(2π)20k2dkk2+m2eikreikrikr=e4π2ir0kdkk2+m2(eikreikr)A_0(\mathbf{r}) = \frac{e}{(2\pi)^2} \int_0^\infty \frac{k^2 dk}{k^2 + m^2} \frac{e^{ikr} - e^{-ikr}}{ikr} = \frac{e}{4\pi^2 i r} \int_0^\infty \frac{k dk}{k^2 + m^2} (e^{ikr} - e^{-ikr}) By changing the integration variable kkk \to -k in the second term, we can extend the integration range to the entire real axis: 0keikrk2+m2dk=0(k)eikr(k)2+m2d(k)=0keikrk2+m2dk\int_0^\infty \frac{k e^{-ikr}}{k^2 + m^2} dk = \int_{-\infty}^0 \frac{(-k) e^{ikr}}{(-k)^2 + m^2} d(-k) = -\int_{-\infty}^0 \frac{k e^{ikr}}{k^2 + m^2} dk Thus, the integral becomes: A0(r)=e4π2irkdkk2+m2eikr\boxed{A_0(r) = \frac{e}{4\pi^2 i r} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{k dk}{k^2 + m^2} e^{ikr}}

(c) To evaluate the integral I=keikrk2+m2dkI = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{k e^{ikr}}{k^2 + m^2} dk, we use contour integration in the complex kk-plane. The integrand has simple poles at k=±imk = \pm im. For r>0r > 0, the factor eikre^{ikr} decays exponentially in the upper half-plane (Im(k)>0\text{Im}(k) > 0). We close the contour with a large semicircle in the upper half-plane. By Jordan's lemma, the integral over the semicircle vanishes as the radius goes to infinity. The closed contour encloses only the pole at k=imk = im. The residue at this pole is: Res(k=im)=limkim(kim)keikr(kim)(k+im)=imemr2im=12emr\text{Res}(k=im) = \lim_{k \to im} (k - im) \frac{k e^{ikr}}{(k - im)(k + im)} = \frac{im e^{-mr}}{2im} = \frac{1}{2} e^{-mr} By the residue theorem, the integral is: I=2πi×12emr=πiemrI = 2\pi i \times \frac{1}{2} e^{-mr} = \pi i e^{-mr} Substituting this back into the expression for A0(r)A_0(r): A0(r)=e4πremr\boxed{A_0(r) = \frac{e}{4\pi r} e^{-mr}}

(d) Taking the limit as the mass m0m \rightarrow 0: limm0A0(r)=limm0e4πremr=e4πr\lim_{m \to 0} A_0(r) = \lim_{m \to 0} \frac{e}{4\pi r} e^{-mr} = \frac{e}{4\pi r} This exactly reproduces the standard Coulomb potential. A0(r)m0e4πr\boxed{A_0(r) \xrightarrow{m \to 0} \frac{e}{4\pi r}}

(e) Qualitative features: The Yukawa potential contains an exponential suppression factor emre^{-mr}, which makes it a short-range force, in contrast to the long-range 1/r1/r behavior of the Coulomb potential. This short-range nature is essential for modeling the strong nuclear force, as it explains why the force is extremely strong within the nucleus but negligible at macroscopic distances. Appropriate value for mm: The characteristic range of the Yukawa potential is R1/mR \sim 1/m. For the force between protons in a nucleus, the range should be on the order of the size of a nucleon, R1 fmR \approx 1 \text{ fm}. Using natural units (=c=1\hbar = c = 1), the mass mm is: m1R=cRc2197 MeVfm1 fm200 MeVm \approx \frac{1}{R} = \frac{\hbar c}{R c^2} \approx \frac{197 \text{ MeV}\cdot\text{fm}}{1 \text{ fm}} \approx 200 \text{ MeV} (Historically, this led Yukawa to predict the existence of the pion, which has a mass of 140 MeV\approx 140 \text{ MeV}). Short-range due to emr factor; m200 MeV\boxed{\text{Short-range due to } e^{-mr} \text{ factor; } m \approx 200 \text{ MeV}}

(f) First, expand the kinetic term in the Lagrangian: 14FμνFμν=12μAνμAν+12μAννAμ-\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} = -\frac{1}{2} \partial_\mu A_\nu \partial^\mu A^\nu + \frac{1}{2} \partial_\mu A_\nu \partial^\nu A^\mu In the action S=d4xLS = \int d^4x \mathcal{L}, the second term can be integrated by parts: d4x12μAννAμ=d4x12AνμνAμ=d4x12Aνν(μAμ)\int d^4x \frac{1}{2} \partial_\mu A_\nu \partial^\nu A^\mu = -\int d^4x \frac{1}{2} A_\nu \partial_\mu \partial^\nu A^\mu = -\int d^4x \frac{1}{2} A_\nu \partial^\nu (\partial_\mu A^\mu) Plugging in the constraint μAμ=0\partial_\mu A^\mu = 0, this term vanishes. The simplified Lagrangian becomes: L=12μAνμAν+12m2AμAμAμJμ\mathcal{L}' = -\frac{1}{2} \partial_\mu A_\nu \partial^\mu A^\nu + \frac{1}{2} m^2 A_\mu A^\mu - A_\mu J^\mu Rederiving the equations of motion from L\mathcal{L}': μL(μAν)LAν=0    μ(μAν)(m2AνJν)=0\partial_\mu \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}'}{\partial (\partial_\mu A_\nu)} - \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}'}{\partial A_\nu} = 0 \implies \partial_\mu (-\partial^\mu A^\nu) - (m^2 A^\nu - J^\nu) = 0 Aν+m2Aν=Jν\boxed{\square A^\nu + m^2 A^\nu = J^\nu} Taking the four-divergence of this new equation of motion yields: ν(Aν+m2Aν)=νJν=0    (+m2)(νAν)=0\partial_\nu (\square A^\nu + m^2 A^\nu) = \partial_\nu J^\nu = 0 \implies (\square + m^2)(\partial_\nu A^\nu) = 0 Can you still find the constraint? No. The new equation only implies that the divergence νAν\partial_\nu A^\nu satisfies the free Klein-Gordon equation, but it does not algebraically constrain it to be zero. The constraint is lost because we used it in the action before varying, which eliminates the degrees of freedom necessary to enforce it dynamically. What is acting as a Lagrange multiplier? In the original Lagrangian (3.87), the time derivative of the scalar potential A0A_0 does not appear (there is no A˙02\dot{A}_0^2 term). Because A0A_0 lacks a dynamical kinetic term, its equation of motion is not an evolution equation but rather a constraint equation (a mass-modified Gauss's law). Therefore, A0A_0 acts as a Lagrange multiplier that enforces the constraint on the vector field. No, the constraint cannot be found; A0 acts as the Lagrange multiplier.\boxed{\text{No, the constraint cannot be found; } A_0 \text{ acts as the Lagrange multiplier.}}

3.7

Problem 3.7

schwarzChapter 3

习题 3.7

来源: 第3章, PDF第44页


3.7 Nonlinear gravity as a classical field theory. In this problem, you will calculate the perihelion shift of Mercury simply by dimensional analysis. (a) The interactions in gravity have

L=MPl2(12hμνhμν+(αhμν)(βhμα)hνβ+)hμνTμν,(3.89)\mathcal{L} = M_{\text{Pl}}^2 \left( -\frac{1}{2} h_{\mu\nu} \square h_{\mu\nu} + (\partial_{\alpha} h_{\mu\nu})(\partial_{\beta} h_{\mu\alpha}) h_{\nu\beta} + \cdots \right) - h_{\mu\nu} T_{\mu\nu}, \tag{3.89}

where MPl=1GNM_{\text{Pl}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{G_N}} is the Planck scale. Rescaling hh, and dropping indices and numbers of order 1, this simplifies to

L=12hh+(MPl)ah2h(MPl)bhT.(3.90)\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{2} h \square h + (M_{\text{Pl}})^a h^2 \square h - (M_{\text{Pl}})^b h T. \tag{3.90}

What are aa and bb (i.e. what are the dimensions of these terms)? (b) The equations of motion following from this Lagrangian are (roughly)

h=(MPl)a(h2)(MPl)bT.(3.91)\square h = (M_{\text{Pl}})^a \square (h^2) - (M_{\text{Pl}})^b T. \tag{3.91}

For a point source T=mδ(3)(x)T = m \delta^{(3)}(x), solve Eq. (3.91) for hh to second order in the source TT (or equivalently to third order in MPl1M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1}). You may use the Coulomb solution we already derived. (c) To first order, hh is just the Newtonian potential. This causes Mercury to orbit. What is Mercury's orbital frequency, ω=2πT\omega = \frac{2\pi}{T}? How does it depend on mMercurym_{\text{Mercury}}, mSunm_{\text{Sun}}, MPlM_{\text{Pl}} and the distance RR between Mercury and the Sun? (d) To second order, there is a correction that causes a small shift in Mercury's orbit. Estimate the order of magnitude of the correction to ω\omega in arcseconds/century using your second-order solution. (e) Estimate how big the effect is of other planets on Mercury's orbital frequency. (Dimensional analysis will do – just get the right powers of masses and distances.) (f) Do you think the shifts from either the second-order correction or from the other planets should be observable for Mercury? What about for Venus? (g) If you derive Eq. (3.91) from Eq. (3.90), what additional terms do you get? Why is it OK to use Eq. (3.91) without these terms?

习题 3.7 - 解答


(a) 量纲分析与参数 a,ba, b 的确定

在自然单位制(=c=1\hbar = c = 1)下,作用量 S=d4xLS = \int d^4x \mathcal{L} 是无量纲的,因此拉格朗日密度 L\mathcal{L} 的质量量纲为 [L]=4[\mathcal{L}] = 4。 在原始拉格朗日量 Eq. (3.89) 中,动能项为 MPl2hμνhμνM_{\text{Pl}}^2 h_{\mu\nu} \square h_{\mu\nu}。由于达朗贝尔算符 []=2[\square] = 2,可得原始场 hμνh_{\mu\nu} 的量纲为: 2[MPl]+2[hold]+2=4    2(1)+2[hold]+2=4    [hold]=02[M_{\text{Pl}}] + 2[h_{\text{old}}] + 2 = 4 \implies 2(1) + 2[h_{\text{old}}] + 2 = 4 \implies [h_{\text{old}}] = 0 为了得到 Eq. (3.90) 中具有标准规范化动能项 12hh-\frac{1}{2} h \square h 的形式,我们需要对场进行重新标度。定义新场 h=MPlholdh = M_{\text{Pl}} h_{\text{old}},此时新场的量纲为 [h]=1[h] = 1。 将 hold=MPl1hh_{\text{old}} = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h 代入原始拉格朗日量:

  1. 三阶相互作用项MPl2(hold)2holdMPl2(MPl1h)2(MPl1h)=MPl1h2hM_{\text{Pl}}^2 (\partial h_{\text{old}})^2 h_{\text{old}} \sim M_{\text{Pl}}^2 (M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h)^2 \square (M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h) = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h^2 \square h。 对比 Eq. (3.90) 中的 (MPl)ah2h(M_{\text{Pl}})^a h^2 \square h,可得 a=1a = -1
  2. 源项holdT(MPl1h)T=MPl1hTh_{\text{old}} T \sim (M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h) T = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h T。 对比 Eq. (3.90) 中的 (MPl)bhT(M_{\text{Pl}})^b h T,可得 b=1b = -1

a=1,b=1\boxed{a = -1, \quad b = -1}

(b) 求解二阶运动方程

a=1,b=1a=-1, b=-1 代入 Eq. (3.91),并考虑静态点源 T=mδ(3)(x)T = m \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}),此时 =2\square = -\nabla^22h=MPl12(h2)+MPl1mδ(3)(x)\nabla^2 h = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} \nabla^2 (h^2) + M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} m \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}) 采用微扰展开 h=h1+h2+O(MPl5)h = h_1 + h_2 + \mathcal{O}(M_{\text{Pl}}^{-5})一阶方程2h1=MPl1mδ(3)(x)\nabla^2 h_1 = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} m \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}) 利用库仑势的格林函数解,得到一阶解: h1=m4πMPlrh_1 = -\frac{m}{4\pi M_{\text{Pl}} r} 二阶方程: 将一阶解代入非线性项中: 2h2=MPl12(h12)\nabla^2 h_2 = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} \nabla^2 (h_1^2) 两边同时去掉拉普拉斯算符(假设无穷远处场趋于零的边界条件): h2=MPl1h12=MPl1(m4πMPlr)2=m216π2MPl3r2h_2 = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h_1^2 = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} \left( -\frac{m}{4\pi M_{\text{Pl}} r} \right)^2 = \frac{m^2}{16\pi^2 M_{\text{Pl}}^3 r^2} 因此,精确到源 TT 的二阶(即 MPl1M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} 的三阶)的解为: h(r)m4πMPlr+m216π2MPl3r2\boxed{h(r) \approx -\frac{m}{4\pi M_{\text{Pl}} r} + \frac{m^2}{16\pi^2 M_{\text{Pl}}^3 r^2}}

(c) 水星的轨道频率(一阶近似)

一阶近似下,引力势能由相互作用项 MPl1hT-M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h T 给出。对于质量为 mMercm_{\text{Merc}} 的水星,其感受到的牛顿势为: V(r)=MPl1h1=m4πMPl2rV(r) = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h_1 = -\frac{m}{4\pi M_{\text{Pl}}^2 r} 这对应于牛顿引力势 GNm/r-G_N m / r,其中 GN=1/(4πMPl2)G_N = 1 / (4\pi M_{\text{Pl}}^2)(若忽略 4π4\pi 因子则 GN=MPl2G_N = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-2},此处保留库仑解的 4π4\pi)。 对于半径为 RR 的圆轨道,向心力等于引力: mMercω2R=mMercm4πMPl2R2m_{\text{Merc}} \omega^2 R = \frac{m_{\text{Merc}} m}{4\pi M_{\text{Pl}}^2 R^2} 解得水星的轨道频率 ω\omegaω=m4πMPl2R3\boxed{\omega = \sqrt{\frac{m}{4\pi M_{\text{Pl}}^2 R^3}}} 该频率与太阳质量 mm、普朗克质量 MPlM_{\text{Pl}} 和轨道半径 RR 有关,但不依赖于水星质量 mMercm_{\text{Merc}}(体现了等效原理)。

(d) 二阶修正导致的近日点进动量级估计

二阶有效势为 Veff(r)=MPl1h=m4πMPl2r+m216π2MPl4r2V_{\text{eff}}(r) = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h = -\frac{m}{4\pi M_{\text{Pl}}^2 r} + \frac{m^2}{16\pi^2 M_{\text{Pl}}^4 r^2}。 势能的相对修正量级为: δVVh2h1mMPl2R=GNmR\frac{\delta V}{V} \sim \frac{h_2}{h_1} \sim \frac{m}{M_{\text{Pl}}^2 R} = \frac{G_N m}{R} 这个无量纲比值直接给出了每转一圈近日点进动的弧度数 δϕ\delta \phi 的量级: δϕGNmR rad/orbit\delta \phi \sim \frac{G_N m}{R} \text{ rad/orbit} 代入太阳和水星的参数:GNm1.5 kmG_N m \approx 1.5 \text{ km}R5.8×107 kmR \approx 5.8 \times 10^7 \text{ km}δϕ1.55.8×1072.6×108 rad/orbit\delta \phi \sim \frac{1.5}{5.8 \times 10^7} \approx 2.6 \times 10^{-8} \text{ rad/orbit} 将其转换为角秒/世纪(arcseconds/century): 1 rad 2×105\approx 2 \times 10^5 arcsec;水星周期 T0.24T \approx 0.24 年,每世纪约转 415415 圈。 Δϕ(2.6×108)×(2×105)×4152.1 arcsec/century\Delta \phi \sim (2.6 \times 10^{-8}) \times (2 \times 10^5) \times 415 \approx 2.1 \text{ arcsec/century} 量纲分析给出的量级估计为 O(1)O(10)\mathcal{O}(1) \sim \mathcal{O}(10) arcsec/century(精确的广义相对论计算结果为 43 arcsec/century,量级完全一致)。 ΔϕGRO(10) arcsec/century\boxed{\Delta \phi_{\text{GR}} \sim \mathcal{O}(10) \text{ arcsec/century}}

(e) 其他行星对水星轨道频率的影响估计

其他行星(如木星)对水星的摄动主要来自潮汐力(引力梯度),因为均匀的引力场只会改变质心运动。 潮汐力引起的相对力学修正量级为: ΔFplanetFSunmplanetmSun(RMercd)3\frac{\Delta F_{\text{planet}}}{F_{\text{Sun}}} \sim \frac{m_{\text{planet}}}{m_{\text{Sun}}} \left( \frac{R_{\text{Merc}}}{d} \right)^3 其中 dd 是行星到水星的距离。以木星为例:mJ/mSun103m_J / m_{\text{Sun}} \sim 10^{-3}RMerc/d0.1R_{\text{Merc}} / d \sim 0.1。 相对修正量级 103×103=106\sim 10^{-3} \times 10^{-3} = 10^{-6}。 每圈的进动弧度 δϕplanet2π×1066×106\delta \phi_{\text{planet}} \sim 2\pi \times 10^{-6} \sim 6 \times 10^{-6} rad/orbit。 转换为角秒/世纪: Δϕplanet(6×106)×(2×105)×415500 arcsec/century\Delta \phi_{\text{planet}} \sim (6 \times 10^{-6}) \times (2 \times 10^5) \times 415 \approx 500 \text{ arcsec/century} ΔϕplanetO(102) arcsec/century\boxed{\Delta \phi_{\text{planet}} \sim \mathcal{O}(10^2) \text{ arcsec/century}}

(f) 水星与金星的观测可行性分析

水星: 二阶修正(GR效应,~43 arcsec/cy)与行星摄动(~500 arcsec/cy)相差约一个数量级。由于行星质量和轨道可以被精确测量,行星摄动可以被精确扣除,因此水星的二阶修正(近日点进动)是完全可观测的

金星: 金星的轨道半径 RR 更大,导致 GR 修正 GNm/R\sim G_N m / R 更小;同时金星周期更长,每世纪转圈数更少,导致其 GR 进动仅约为 8 arcsec/cy。 另一方面,地球距离金星很近且质量较大,导致对金星的行星摄动极大(数千 arcsec/cy)。此外,金星的轨道极度接近正圆(偏心率 e0.006e \approx 0.006),这使得在几何上极难精确定位其近日点的位置。因此,金星的二阶修正极难被观测到

水星:可观测;金星:不可观测\boxed{\text{水星:可观测;金星:不可观测}}

(g) 从 Eq. (3.90) 推导 Eq. (3.91) 时丢失的项及其合理性

对拉格朗日量 L=12hh+MPl1h2hMPl1hT\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{2} h \square h + M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h^2 \square h - M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h T 关于场 hh 进行变分。 非线性项的变分为: δd4x(MPl1h2h)=MPl1d4x(2h(δh)h+h2(δh))\delta \int d^4x (M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h^2 \square h) = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} \int d^4x \left( 2h (\delta h) \square h + h^2 \square (\delta h) \right) 利用分部积分将第二个项中的 \square 转移到 h2h^2 上: =MPl1d4x(2hh+(h2))δh= M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} \int d^4x \left( 2h \square h + \square(h^2) \right) \delta h 完整的运动方程应为: h=MPl1(h2)MPl1T+2MPl1hh\square h = M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} \square(h^2) - M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} T + 2 M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h \square h 对比 Eq. (3.91),丢失的附加项为: 2MPl1hh\boxed{2 M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h \square h}

忽略该项的合理性: 在微扰求解时,我们将一阶解 h1h_1 代入二阶非线性项中。一阶解满足 h1=MPl1T\square h_1 = -M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} T。 对于计算水星轨道,我们关心的是源外部(即太阳外部 r>0r > 0)的引力场。在源外部,物质密度 T=0T = 0,因此 h1=0\square h_1 = 0。 这意味着在源外部,附加项 2MPl1h1h12 M_{\text{Pl}}^{-1} h_1 \square h_1 严格为零。因此,在计算外部真空解的二阶修正时,忽略该项是完全合理的。

3.8

Problem 3.8

schwarzChapter 3

习题 3.8

来源: 第3章, PDF第44页


3.8 How does the blackbody paradox argument show that the electromagnetic field cannot be classical while electrons and atoms are quantum mechanical? Should the same arguments apply to treating gravity classically and electrons quantum mechanically?

习题 3.8 - 解答


黑体辐射佯谬对半经典模型(量子物质+经典电磁场)的否定分析

在理论物理中,考察一个由量子力学的原子(或电子)与经典电磁场组成的混合系统。假设该系统处于温度为 TT 的热平衡状态。

  1. 经典场的自由度与能量均分定理: 经典电磁场在有限体积的空腔内可以展开为无穷多个简正模(normal modes)。在三维空间中,频率在 ω\omegaω+dω\omega + d\omega 之间的模式数密度正比于 ω2dω\omega^2 d\omega。如果电磁场是经典的,根据经典统计力学的能量均分定理,在热平衡时,每一个简正模都将平均分配到 kTkT 的能量(其中 kk 为玻尔兹曼常数)。

  2. 热平衡与紫外灾难(Ultraviolet Catastrophe): 由于高频(紫外)区域的模式数量趋于无穷大,经典电磁场具有无穷大的热容。当具有离散能级的量子原子与连续的经典电磁场发生相互作用(如吸收和辐射)时,系统必须趋向热平衡。为了满足能量均分定理,能量会不可逆地从量子物质连续不断地流向经典电磁场的高频模式中。

  3. 物理结论: 在这种半经典模型中,量子物质最终会将其所有的热能辐射到经典场中,导致物质冷却到绝对零度(T0T \to 0),而电磁场的高频模式将吸收无穷大的能量。这不仅违背了能量守恒(若总能量有限),也表明量子物质与经典场之间根本无法建立稳定的、非零温的热平衡。 为了避免这一灾难,电磁场必须被量子化。通过引入光子(能量为 E=ωE = \hbar\omega),高频模式的激发概率会被玻尔兹曼因子 eω/kTe^{-\hbar\omega/kT} 呈指数级压制,从而得到收敛的普朗克辐射定律。

因此,黑体辐射佯谬的统计力学论证直接排除了“物质是量子的而电磁场是经典的”这一可能性。

量子物质与经典电磁场无法达到热平衡,物质的能量会全部耗散到具有无穷多高频自由度的经典场中。因此电磁场必须量子化。\boxed{\text{量子物质与经典电磁场无法达到热平衡,物质的能量会全部耗散到具有无穷多高频自由度的经典场中。因此电磁场必须量子化。}}

该论证对引力场与量子物质混合模型的适用性分析

同样的统计热力学论证完全适用于“经典引力场+量子物质”的半经典引力(Semiclassical Gravity)模型。

  1. 引力场的自由度: 在广义相对论中,时空度规的微扰(引力波)同样表现为无质量的张量场。与电磁场一样,经典引力场在空间中也具有无穷多个简正模,且其高频模式的态密度同样随频率发散。

  2. 引力紫外灾难: 如果引力场是经典的,而电子、原子等物质是量子的,当它们处于热平衡时,量子物质会通过引力相互作用(例如发射和吸收引力波)与经典引力场交换能量。根据能量均分定理,经典引力场的每一个模式都应获得 kTkT 的能量。 由于经典引力场包含无穷多高频模式,它同样具有无穷大的热容。量子物质的热能将不可避免地、持续不断地转化为高频引力波辐射。

  3. 物理结论: 尽管引力耦合常数极其微弱,导致这种能量耗散的速率在宏观或实验室尺度下极慢(弛豫时间极长),但从基础理论和严格的热力学平衡角度来看,量子物质与经典引力场无法共存于稳定的热平衡态。物质最终会将其所有能量辐射为高频引力波。 为了截断高频引力模式的激发,引力场也必须遵循量子统计规律(即存在能量为 E=ωE = \hbar\omega 的引力子),使得高频引力子的激发被量子统计压制。

相同的论证完全适用于引力。若引力是经典的而物质是量子的,系统将面临“引力紫外灾难”,因此引力场在根本上也必须被量子化。\boxed{\text{相同的论证完全适用于引力。若引力是经典的而物质是量子的,系统将面临“引力紫外灾难”,因此引力场在根本上也必须被量子化。}}
3.9

Problem 3.9

schwarzChapter 3

习题 3.9

来源: 第3章, PDF第44,45页


3.9 Photon polarizations (this problem follows the approach in [Feynman et al., 1996]). (a) Starting with L=14Fμν2+JμAμ\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu}^2 + J_{\mu} A_{\mu}, substitute in AμA_{\mu}'s equations of motion. This is called integrating out AμA_{\mu}. In momentum space, you should get something like Jμ1k2JμJ_{\mu} \frac{1}{k^2} J_{\mu}. (b) Choose kμ=(ω,κ,0,0)k_{\mu} = (\omega, \kappa, 0, 0). Use current conservation (μJμ=0\partial_{\mu} J_{\mu} = 0) to formally solve for J1J_1 in terms of J0,ωJ_0, \omega and κ\kappa in this coordinate system. (c) Rewrite the interaction Jμ1k2JμJ_{\mu} \frac{1}{k^2} J_{\mu} in terms of J0,J2,J3,ωJ_0, J_2, J_3, \omega and κ\kappa. (d) In what way is a term without time derivatives instantaneous (non-causal)? How many causally propagating degrees of freedom are there?

(e) How do we know that the instantaneous term(s) do not imply that you can communicate faster than the speed of light?

习题 3.9 - 解答


习题 3.9 分析与解答

本题通过在动量空间中“积掉(integrate out)”光子场 AμA_\mu,分析电磁相互作用的自由度与因果性。计算采用自然单位制与大多为负的度规约定 ημν=diag(1,1,1,1)\eta_{\mu\nu} = \text{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1)


(a) 积掉 AμA_\mu 并求动量空间中的有效相互作用

首先写出包含源项的电磁场拉格朗日量: L=14FμνFμν+JμAμ\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} + J_\mu A^\mu 利用分部积分(舍去全微分项),可以将动能项改写为: L=12Aμ(ημνμν)Aν+JμAμ\mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2} A_\mu (\square \eta^{\mu\nu} - \partial^\mu \partial^\nu) A_\nu + J_\mu A^\muAμA_\mu 变分求欧拉-拉格朗日运动方程(EOM): δSδAμ=0    (ημνμν)Aν+Jμ=0\frac{\delta S}{\delta A_\mu} = 0 \implies (\square \eta^{\mu\nu} - \partial^\mu \partial^\nu) A_\nu + J^\mu = 0 即运动方程为 (ημνμν)Aν=Jμ(\square \eta^{\mu\nu} - \partial^\mu \partial^\nu) A_\nu = -J^\mu。将此运动方程代回原拉格朗日量中,得到有效拉格朗日量: Leff=12Aμ(Jμ)+JμAμ=12JμAμ\mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} = \frac{1}{2} A_\mu (-J^\mu) + J_\mu A^\mu = \frac{1}{2} J_\mu A^\mu 接下来转换到动量空间,导数替换为 μikμ\partial^\mu \to -ik^\muk2\square \to -k^2。运动方程变为: (k2ημνkμkν)Aν=Jμ(k^2 \eta^{\mu\nu} - k^\mu k^\nu) A_\nu = J^\mu 由于流守恒 μJμ=0\partial_\mu J^\mu = 0,在动量空间中有 kμJμ=0k_\mu J^\mu = 0。我们在等式两边同乘 JμJ_\muk2JμAμ(kμJμ)(kνAν)=JμJμk^2 J^\mu A_\mu - (k_\mu J^\mu)(k^\nu A_\nu) = J_\mu J^\mu 第二项因 kμJμ=0k_\mu J^\mu = 0 而消失,因此得到: JμAμ=Jμ1k2JμJ^\mu A_\mu = J_\mu \frac{1}{k^2} J^\mu 代入有效拉格朗日量,得到动量空间中的有效相互作用项为: Leff=12Jμ1k2Jμ\boxed{ \mathcal{L}_{\text{eff}} = \frac{1}{2} J_\mu \frac{1}{k^2} J^\mu }


(b) 利用流守恒求解 J1J^1

选取坐标系使得光子的四维动量为 kμ=(ω,κ,0,0)k^\mu = (\omega, \kappa, 0, 0)。 在动量空间中,流守恒定律 μJμ=0\partial_\mu J^\mu = 0 表现为 kμJμ=0k_\mu J^\mu = 0。 展开该内积: kμJμ=ωJ0κJ10J20J3=0k_\mu J^\mu = \omega J^0 - \kappa J^1 - 0 \cdot J^2 - 0 \cdot J^3 = 0 由此可以直接解出 J1J^1J1=ωκJ0\boxed{ J^1 = \frac{\omega}{\kappa} J^0 }


(c) 重写相互作用项

将相互作用项 Jμ1k2JμJ_\mu \frac{1}{k^2} J^\mu 展开: Jμ1k2Jμ=1k2((J0)2(J1)2(J2)2(J3)2)J_\mu \frac{1}{k^2} J^\mu = \frac{1}{k^2} \left( (J^0)^2 - (J^1)^2 - (J^2)^2 - (J^3)^2 \right) 将 (b) 中得到的 J1=ωκJ0J^1 = \frac{\omega}{\kappa} J^0 代入上式,消去 J1J^1Jμ1k2Jμ=1k2((J0)2ω2κ2(J0)2(J2)2(J3)2)J_\mu \frac{1}{k^2} J^\mu = \frac{1}{k^2} \left( (J^0)^2 - \frac{\omega^2}{\kappa^2} (J^0)^2 - (J^2)^2 - (J^3)^2 \right) 合并前两项: (J0)2(1ω2κ2)=(J0)2(κ2ω2κ2)(J^0)^2 \left( 1 - \frac{\omega^2}{\kappa^2} \right) = (J^0)^2 \left( \frac{\kappa^2 - \omega^2}{\kappa^2} \right) 注意到四维动量平方 k2=ω2κ2k^2 = \omega^2 - \kappa^2,因此 κ2ω2=k2\kappa^2 - \omega^2 = -k^2。代入上式: (J0)2(k2κ2)=k2(J0)2κ2(J^0)^2 \left( \frac{-k^2}{\kappa^2} \right) = -k^2 \frac{(J^0)^2}{\kappa^2} 将其放回完整的相互作用表达式中,第一项的 k2k^2 与分母的 k2k^2 抵消: 1k2(k2(J0)2κ2(J2)2(J3)2)=(J0)2κ2(J2)2+(J3)2k2\frac{1}{k^2} \left( -k^2 \frac{(J^0)^2}{\kappa^2} - (J^2)^2 - (J^3)^2 \right) = -\frac{(J^0)^2}{\kappa^2} - \frac{(J^2)^2 + (J^3)^2}{k^2} 最终重写后的相互作用项为: Jμ1k2Jμ=(J0)2κ2(J2)2+(J3)2k2\boxed{ J_\mu \frac{1}{k^2} J^\mu = -\frac{(J^0)^2}{\kappa^2} - \frac{(J^2)^2 + (J^3)^2}{k^2} }


(d) 瞬时项的非因果性与传播自由度

瞬时性分析: 在结果 (J0)2κ2(J2)2+(J3)2ω2κ2-\frac{(J^0)^2}{\kappa^2} - \frac{(J^2)^2 + (J^3)^2}{\omega^2 - \kappa^2} 中,第一项 (J0)2κ2-\frac{(J^0)^2}{\kappa^2} 的分母仅依赖于空间动量 κ\kappa,而不包含频率 ω\omega(即在位置空间中没有时间导数)。 在进行傅里叶逆变换回到位置空间时,缺乏 ω\omega 依赖意味着对 ω\omega 的积分会直接给出一个狄拉克 δ\delta 函数 δ(tt)\delta(t-t')。这表示该相互作用在时间上是瞬时的(即库仑势 1/r1/r 瞬间建立),表面上看起来违背了狭义相对论的因果律(非因果的)。

传播自由度数量: 因果传播的自由度对应于表达式中包含动力学传播子 1k2=1ω2κ2\frac{1}{k^2} = \frac{1}{\omega^2 - \kappa^2} 的项。这些项在 ω=±κ\omega = \pm \kappa 处有极点,对应于以光速传播的推迟/超前势。 观察表达式,只有 J2J^2J3J^3 耦合到了 1k2\frac{1}{k^2}。因此,因果传播的自由度数量为: 2 个(对应光子的两个横向极化自由度)\boxed{ \text{2 个(对应光子的两个横向极化自由度)} }


(e) 瞬时项为何不导致超光速通信

虽然库仑相互作用项 (J0)2κ2-\frac{(J^0)^2}{\kappa^2} 在数学形式上是瞬时的,但这并不意味着可以利用它进行超光速通信

物理原因在于局域电荷守恒(流守恒)。瞬时项完全由电荷密度 J0J^0 决定。根据连续性方程 tJ0+J=0\partial_t J^0 + \nabla \cdot \vec{J} = 0,你无法在空间某处凭空产生或消灭电荷(即无法瞬间改变远处的 J0J^0 来发送信号)。 要改变某一点的电荷密度 J0J^0,必须有物理的电流 J\vec{J} 将电荷输运过去,而携带电荷的物质或电流的传播速度严格受限于光速 cc。因此,作为源的 J0J^0 本身的任何改变都是因果的。源的因果性保证了即使库仑场在数学上与源“瞬时”绑定,整个物理过程(源的移动 \to 场的改变 \to 远处接收信号)依然严格遵守因果律,无法实现超光速信息传递。 局域电荷守恒(μJμ=0)限制了源 J0 的改变必须通过因果的物理电流实现。\boxed{ \text{局域电荷守恒(} \partial_\mu J^\mu = 0 \text{)限制了源 } J^0 \text{ 的改变必须通过因果的物理电流实现。} }