12.1

Problem 12.1

schwarzChapter 12

习题 12.1

来源: 第12章, PDF第223页


12.1 In a causal theory, commutators of observables should vanish outside the lightcone, [ϕ(x),ϕ(y)]=0[\phi(x), \phi(y)] = 0 for (xy)2<0(x - y)^2 < 0. For spinors, we found that with anticommutation relations {ψˉ(x),ψ(y)}=0\{\bar{\psi}(x), \psi(y)\} = 0 outside the lightcone. This implies that integer spin quantities constructed out of spinors are automatically causal, e.g. [ψˉψ(x),ψˉψ(y)]=0[\bar{\psi}\psi(x), \bar{\psi}\psi(y)] = 0. However, this is not a proof that spinors must anticommute. What would happen to [ψˉψ(x),ψˉψ(y)][\bar{\psi}\psi(x), \bar{\psi}\psi(y)] outside the lightcone if we used commutation relations for spinors? For simplicity, you can just look at 0[ψˉψ(x),ψˉψ(y)]0\langle 0 | [\bar{\psi}\psi(x), \bar{\psi}\psi(y)] | 0 \rangle.

习题 12.1 - 解答


先分析物理背景

自旋统计定理表明,半整数自旋的费米场必须使用反对易关系进行量子化。题目要求我们假设旋量场使用对易关系(即错误的玻色子统计)进行量子化,并考察由其构成的双线性可观测量 ψˉψ(x)\bar{\psi}\psi(x) 在类空间隔下的因果性(即对易子是否为零)。

下面计算真空期望值 0[ψˉψ(x),ψˉψ(y)]0\langle 0 | [\bar{\psi}\psi(x), \bar{\psi}\psi(y)] | 0 \rangle

首先,写出旋量场在对易关系假设下的两点关联函数。设标量场的 Wightman 传播子为 D(xy)=d3p(2π)32Epeip(xy)D(x-y) = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3 2E_p} e^{-ip(x-y)}。 对于使用对易关系 [apr,aqs]=(2π)3δ3(pq)δrs[a_{\mathbf{p}}^r, a_{\mathbf{q}}^{s\dagger}] = (2\pi)^3 \delta^3(\mathbf{p}-\mathbf{q})\delta^{rs}[bpr,bqs]=(2π)3δ3(pq)δrs[b_{\mathbf{p}}^r, b_{\mathbf{q}}^{s\dagger}] = (2\pi)^3 \delta^3(\mathbf{p}-\mathbf{q})\delta^{rs} 量子化的 Dirac 场,非零的缩并(传播子)为: Sαβ+(xy)0ψα(x)ψˉβ(y)0=d3p(2π)32Ep(+m)αβeip(xy)=(iγμμ+m)αβD(xy)S^+_{\alpha\beta}(x-y) \equiv \langle 0 | \psi_\alpha(x) \bar{\psi}_\beta(y) | 0 \rangle = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3 2E_p} (\not{p}+m)_{\alpha\beta} e^{-ip(x-y)} = (i\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu + m)_{\alpha\beta} D(x-y) Sβα(xy)0ψˉα(x)ψβ(y)0=d3p(2π)32Ep(m)βαeip(xy)=(iγμμm)βαD(xy)S^-_{\beta\alpha}(x-y) \equiv \langle 0 | \bar{\psi}_\alpha(x) \psi_\beta(y) | 0 \rangle = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3 2E_p} (\not{p}-m)_{\beta\alpha} e^{-ip(x-y)} = (i\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m)_{\beta\alpha} D(x-y)

分两步处理对易子的真空期望值: 0[ψˉψ(x),ψˉψ(y)]0=0ψˉα(x)ψα(x)ψˉβ(y)ψβ(y)00ψˉβ(y)ψβ(y)ψˉα(x)ψα(x)0\langle 0 | [\bar{\psi}\psi(x), \bar{\psi}\psi(y)] | 0 \rangle = \langle 0 | \bar{\psi}_\alpha(x) \psi_\alpha(x) \bar{\psi}_\beta(y) \psi_\beta(y) | 0 \rangle - \langle 0 | \bar{\psi}_\beta(y) \psi_\beta(y) \bar{\psi}_\alpha(x) \psi_\alpha(x) | 0 \rangle

利用对易场的 Wick 定理(算符交换时不产生费米负号),第一项的连通图部分贡献为: V(x,y)0ψˉα(x)ψα(x)ψˉβ(y)ψβ(y)0conn=0ψˉα(x)ψβ(y)00ψα(x)ψˉβ(y)0V(x,y) \equiv \langle 0 | \bar{\psi}_\alpha(x) \psi_\alpha(x) \bar{\psi}_\beta(y) \psi_\beta(y) | 0 \rangle_{\text{conn}} = \langle 0 | \bar{\psi}_\alpha(x) \psi_\beta(y) | 0 \rangle \langle 0 | \psi_\alpha(x) \bar{\psi}_\beta(y) | 0 \rangle =Sβα(xy)Sαβ+(xy)=Tr[S(xy)S+(xy)]= S^-_{\beta\alpha}(x-y) S^+_{\alpha\beta}(x-y) = \text{Tr}[S^-(x-y) S^+(x-y)] (注:非连通图部分 0ψˉψ02\langle 0|\bar{\psi}\psi|0 \rangle^2xyx \leftrightarrow y 交换下显然对称,在对易子中会直接抵消,故只需关注连通部分)。

代入 S+S^+SS^- 的表达式计算 Dirac 迹: Tr[S(xy)S+(xy)]=Tr[(iγμμm)D(xy)(iγνν+m)D(xy)]\text{Tr}[S^-(x-y) S^+(x-y)] = \text{Tr}\left[ (i\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m)D(x-y) (i\gamma^\nu \partial_\nu + m)D(x-y) \right] 展开并利用 Dirac 矩阵的迹性质 Tr[γμ]=0\text{Tr}[\gamma^\mu] = 0Tr[γμγν]=4ημν\text{Tr}[\gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu] = 4\eta^{\mu\nu}V(x,y)=Tr[γμγν(μD(xy))(νD(xy))m2D(xy)2]V(x,y) = \text{Tr}\left[ -\gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu (\partial_\mu D(x-y)) (\partial_\nu D(x-y)) - m^2 D(x-y)^2 \right] V(x,y)=4[μD(xy)μD(xy)+m2D(xy)2]V(x,y) = -4 \left[ \partial_\mu D(x-y) \partial^\mu D(x-y) + m^2 D(x-y)^2 \right]

分析类空间隔下的行为

当处于光锥外即 (xy)2<0(x-y)^2 < 0 时,标量传播子 D(xy)D(x-y) 仅依赖于洛伦兹不变量 (xy)2(x-y)^2,因此它是一个关于坐标差 (xy)(x-y)偶函数。 其一阶导数 μD(xy)\partial_\mu D(x-y) 是关于 (xy)(x-y) 的奇函数,但其平方项 μD(xy)μD(xy)\partial_\mu D(x-y) \partial^\mu D(x-y) 依然是偶函数。 因此,整个迹 V(x,y)V(x,y) 在类空间隔下是关于 (xy)(x-y) 的偶函数,即: V(x,y)=V(y,x)for (xy)2<0V(x,y) = V(y,x) \quad \text{for } (x-y)^2 < 0

将此结果代回对易子期望值中,得到: 0[ψˉψ(x),ψˉψ(y)]0=V(x,y)V(y,x)=0\langle 0 | [\bar{\psi}\psi(x), \bar{\psi}\psi(y)] | 0 \rangle = V(x,y) - V(y,x) = 0

物理结论

即使我们错误地使用对易关系来量子化旋量场,由其构成的双线性可观测量在光锥外依然是对易的。这解释了题目中的论断:“这并不能证明旋量必须反对易”。自旋统计定理对于费米子的真正强制性要求,并不来源于可观测量的微观因果性,而是为了保证系统的哈密顿量具有能量下界(Energy Positivity)。

最终结果为: 0[ψˉψ(x),ψˉψ(y)]0=0for (xy)2<0\boxed{ \langle 0 | [\bar{\psi}\psi(x), \bar{\psi}\psi(y)] | 0 \rangle = 0 \quad \text{for } (x-y)^2 < 0 }