5.1 Coulomb scattering. Repeat the computation of Problem 4.4, part (c), this time using the full relativistic expression for the matrix element. You should find, for the spin-averaged cross section,
dΩdσ=4∣p∣2β2sin4(θ/2)α2(1−β2sin22θ),
where p is the electron's 3-momentum and β is its velocity. This is the Mott formula for Coulomb scattering of relativistic electrons. Now derive it in a second way, by working
out the cross section for electron-muon scattering, in the muon rest frame, retaining the electron mass but sending mμ→∞.
5.2 Bhabha scattering. Compute the differential cross section dσ/dcosθ for Bhabha scattering, e+e−→e+e−. You may work in the limit Ecm≫me, in which it is permissible to ignore the electron mass. There are two Feynman diagrams; these must be added in the invariant matrix element before squaring. Be sure that you have the correct relative sign between these diagrams. The intermediate steps are complicated, but the final result is quite simple. In particular, you may find it useful to introduce the Mandelstam variables s, t, and u. Note that, if we ignore the electron mass, s+t+u=0. You should be able to cast the differential cross section into the form
dcosθdσ=sπα2[u2(s1+t1)2+(st)2+(ts)2].
Rewrite this formula in terms of cosθ and graph it. What feature of the diagrams causes the differential cross section to diverge as θ→0?
5.3 The spinor product formalism introduced in Problem 3.3 provides an efficient way to compute tree diagrams involving massless particles. Recall that in Problem 3.3 we defined spinor products as follows: Let uL0, uR0 be the left- and right-handed spinors at some fixed lightlike momentum k0. These satisfy
uL0uˉL0=(21−γ5)k0,uR0uˉR0=(21+γ5)k0.(1)
(These relations are just the projections onto definite helicity of the more standard formula ∑u0uˉ0=k0.) Then define spinors for any other lightlike momentum p by
uL(p)=2p⋅k01puR0,uR(p)=2p⋅k01puL0.(2)
We showed that these spinors satisfy pu(p)=0; because there is no m around, they can be used as spinors for either fermions or antifermions. We defined
(a) To warm up, give another proof of the last relation in Eq. (3) by using (1) to rewrite ∣s(p1,p2)∣2 as a trace of Dirac matrices, and then applying the trace calculus.
(b) Show that, for any string of Dirac matrices,
tr[γμγνγρ⋯]=tr[⋯γργνγμ]
where μ,ν,ρ,⋯=0,1,2,3, or 5. Use this identity to show that
where a,b=1,2,3,4 are Dirac indices. This can be done by justifying the following statements: The right-hand side of this equation is a Dirac matrix; thus, it can be written as a linear combination of the 16 Γ matrices discussed in Section 3.4. It satisfies
γ5[M]=−[M]γ5,
thus, it must have the form
[M]=(21−γ5)γμVμ+(21+γ5)γμWμ
where Vμ and Wμ are 4-vectors. These 4-vectors can be computed by trace technology; for example,
Vν=21tr[γν(21−γ5)M].
(d) Consider the process e+e−→μ+μ−, to the leading order in α, ignoring the masses of both the electron and the muon. Consider first the case in which the electron and the final muon are both right-handed and the positron and the final antimuon are both left-handed. (Use the spinor vR for the antimuon and uˉR for the positron.) Apply the Fierz identity to show that the amplitude can be evaluated directly in terms of spinor products. Square the amplitude and reproduce the result for
dcosθdσ(eR−eL+→μR−μL+)
given in Eq. (5.22). Compute the other helicity cross sections for this process and show that they also reproduce the results found in Section 5.2.
(e) Compute the differential cross section for Bhabha scattering of massless electrons, helicity state by helicity state, using the spinor product formalism. The average over initial helicities, summed over final helicities, should reproduce the result of Problem 5.2. In the process, you should see how this result arises as the sum of definite-helicity contributions.
(a) Compute the amplitude M for e+e− annihilation into 2 photons in the extreme nonrelativistic limit (i.e., keep only the term proportional to zero powers of the electron and positron 3-momentum). Use this result, together with our formalism for fermion-antifermion bound states, to compute the rate of annihilation of the 1S states of positronium into 2 photons. You should find that the spin-1 states of positronium do not annihilate into 2 photons, confirming the symmetry argument of Problem 3.8. For the spin-0 state of positronium, you should find a result proportional to the square of the 1S wavefunction at the origin. Inserting the value of this wavefunction from nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, you should find
τ1=Γ=2α5me≈8.03×109 sec−1.
A recent measurement‡ gives Γ=7.994±.011 nsec−1; the 0.5% discrepancy is accounted for by radiative corrections.
(b) Computing the decay rates of higher-l positronium states is somewhat more difficult; in the rest of this problem, we will consider the case l=1. First, work out the terms in the e+e−→2γ amplitude proportional to one power of the 3-momentum. (For simplicity, work in the center-of-mass frame.) Since
∫(2π)3d3ppiψ(p)=i∂xi∂ψ(x)x=0,
this piece of the amplitude has overlap with P-wave bound states. Show that the S=1, but not the S=0 states, can decay to 2 photons. Again, this is a consequence of C.
(c) To compute the decay rates of these P-wave states, we need properly normalized state vectors. Denote the three P-state wavefunctions by
ψi=xif(∣x∣),normalized to ∫d3xψi∗(x)ψj(x)=δij,
and their Fourier transforms by ψi(p). Show that
∣B(k)⟩=2M∫(2π)3d3pψi(p)ap+k/2†Σib−p+k/2†∣0⟩
is a properly normalized bound-state vector if Σi denotes a set of three 2×2 matrices normalized to
i∑tr(Σi†Σi)=1.
To build S=1 states, we should take each Σi to contain a Pauli sigma matrix. In general, spin-orbit coupling will split the multiplet of S=1,L=1 states according to the total angular momentum J. The states of definite J are given by
where n is a polarization vector satisfying ∣n∣2=1 and hij is a traceless tensor, for which a typical value might be h12=1 and all other components zero.
(d) Using the expanded form for the e+e−→2γ amplitude derived in part (b) and the explicit form of the S=1,L=1, definite-J positronium states found in part (c), compute, for each J, the decay rate of the state into two photons.
习题 5.4 - 解答
(a) 1S 态正电子素的衰变率
先分析极端非相对论极限下的 e+e−→2γ 散射振幅。设电子和正电子的动量为 p1=p2=(m,0),光子动量为 k1=(m,k) 和 k2=(m,−k),其中 ∣k∣=m。
根据 Feynman 规则,树图阶振幅(包含 t 通道和 u 通道)为:
5.5 Physics of a massive vector boson. Add to QED a massive photon field Bμ of mass M, which couples to electrons via
ΔH=∫d3x(gψˉγμψBμ).
A massive photon in the initial or final state has three possible physical polarizations, corresponding to the three spacelike unit vectors in the boson's rest frame. These can be characterized invariantly, in terms of the boson's 4-momentum kμ, as the three vectors ϵμ(i) satisfying
ϵ(i)⋅ϵ(j)=−δij,k⋅ϵ(i)=0.
The four vectors (kμ/M,ϵμ(i)) form a complete orthonormal basis. Because Bμ couples to the conserved current ψˉγμψ, the Ward identity implies that kμ dotted into the amplitude for B production gives zero; thus we can replace:
i∑ϵμ(i)ϵν(i)∗→−gμν.
This gives a generalization to massive bosons of the Feynman trick for photon polarization vectors and simplifies the calculation of B production cross sections. (Warning: This trick does not work (so simply) for "non-Abelian gauge fields".) Let's do a few of these computations, using always the approximation of ignoring the mass of the electron.
(a) Compute the cross section for the process e+e−→B. Compute the lifetime of the B, assuming that it decays only to electrons. Verify the relation
σ(e+e−→B)=M12π2Γ(B→e+e−)δ(M2−s)
discussed in Section 5.3.
(b) Compute the differential cross section, in the center-of-mass system, for the process e+e−→γ+B. (This calculation goes over almost unchanged to the realistic process e+e−→γ+Z0; this allows one to measure the number of decays of the Z0 into unobserved final states, which is in turn proportional to the number of neutrino species.)
(c) Notice that the cross section of part (b) diverges as θ→0 or π. Let us analyze the region near θ=0. In this region, the dominant contribution comes from the t-channel diagram and corresponds intuitively to the emission of a photon from the electron line before e+e− annihilation into a B. Let us rearrange the formula in such a way as to support this interpretation. First, note that the divergence as θ→0 is cut off by the electron mass: Let the electron momentum be pμ=(E,0,0,k), with k=(E2−me2)1/2, and let the photon momentum be kμ=(xE,xEsinθ,0,xEcosθ). Show that the denominator of the propagator then never becomes smaller than O(me2/s). Now integrate the cross section of part (b) over forward angles, cutting off the θ integral at θ2∼(me2/s) and keeping only the leading logarithmic term, proportional to log(s/me2). Show that, in this approximation, the cross section for forward photon emission can be written
σ(e+e−→γ+B)≈∫dxf(x)⋅σ(e+e−→B at Ecm2=(1−x)s),
where the annihilation cross section is evaluated for the collision of a positron of energy E and an electron of energy (1−x)E, and the function f(x), the Weizsäcker-Williams distribution function, is given by
f(x)=2παx1+(1−x)2⋅log(me2s).
This function arises universally in processes in which a photon is emitted collinearly from an electron line, independent of the subsequent dynamics. We will meet it again, in another context, in Problem 6.2.
5.6 This problem extends the spinor product technology of Problem 5.3 to external photons.
(a) Let k be the momentum of a photon, and let p be another lightlike vector, chosen so that p⋅k=0. Let uR(p), uL(p) be spinors of definite helicity for fermions with the lightlike momentum p, defined according to the conventions of Problem 5.3. Define photon polarization vectors as follows:
The second term on the right gives zero when dotted with any photon emission amplitude Mμ, so we have
∣ϵ+⋅M∣2+∣ϵ−⋅M∣2=MμMν∗(−gμν);
thus, we can use the vectors ϵ+, ϵ− to compute photon polarization sums.
(b) Using the polarization vectors just defined, and the spinor products and the Fierz identity from Problem 5.3, compute the differential cross section for a massless electron and positron to annihilate into 2 photons. Show that the result agrees with the massless limit derived in (5.107):
dcosθdσ=s2πα2(sin2θ1+cos2θ)
in the center-of-mass frame. It follows from the result of part (a) that this answer is independent of the particular vector p used to define the polarization vectors; however, the calculation is greatly simplified by taking this vector to be the initial electron 4-vector.